Literature DB >> 16966684

Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

Katja Ott1, Wolfgang A Weber, Florian Lordick, Karen Becker, Raymonde Busch, Ken Herrmann, Hinrich Wieder, Ulrich Fink, Markus Schwaiger, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A previous study suggested that measurement of therapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism by positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) allows to select patients most likely to benefit from preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). The aim of this study was to prospectively validate these findings by using an a priori definition of metabolic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with locally advanced AEGs were included. Tumor glucose utilization was quantitatively assessed by FDG-PET before chemotherapy and 14 days after initiation of therapy. Patients were classified as metabolic responders when the metabolic activity of the primary tumor had decreased by more than 35% at the time of the second PET.
RESULTS: Metabolic responders showed a high histopathologic response rate (44%) with a 3-year survival rate of 70%. In contrast, prognosis was poor for metabolic nonresponders with a histopathologic response rate of 5% (P = .001) and a 3-year survival rate of 35% (P = .01). A multivariate analysis (covariates: ypT-, ypN-category, histopathologic response) demonstrated that metabolic response was the only factor predicting recurrence (P = .018) in the subgroup of completely resected (R0) patients.
CONCLUSION: This study prospectively demonstrates that changes in tumor metabolic activity during chemotherapy predict response, prognosis, and recurrence. These data provide the basis for clinical trials in which preoperative treatment is changed for patients without a metabolic response early in the course of therapy. PET-guided induction therapy may even be applicable to earlier tumor stages because surgery is only minimally delayed in nonresponding patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16966684     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  148 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A case of advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Celina Ang; Yelena Y Janjigian; Ali Shamseddine; Ayman Tawil; Maeve A Lowery; Andrew Intlekofer; Walid Faraj; Ashwaq Al-Olayan; Laura Tang; Eileen M O'Reilly; Fady Geara; Aghiad Al-Kutoubi; David P Kelsen; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03

3.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Predictive value of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in head and neck cancer: importance of standardization: editorial on EAORL-D-10-00277.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Development of radiotracers for oncology--the interface with pharmacology.

Authors:  Rohini Sharma; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

7.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

8.  Assessment of histological response of paediatric bone sarcomas using FDG PET in comparison to morphological volume measurement and standardized MRI parameters.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Patrick Hundsdörfer; Daniel Misch; Ingo G Steffen; Stefan Schönberger; Christian Furth; Michail Plotkin; Juri Ruf; Hubertus Hautzel; Brigitte Stöver; Regine Kluge; Uta Bierbach; Sylke Otto; James F Beck; Christiane Franzius; Günter Henze; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kazuto Harada; Xuemei Wang; Yusuke Shimodaira; Tara Sagebiel; Manoop S Bhutani; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian Weston; Elena Elimova; Quan Lin; Fatemeh G Amlashi; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Anthony Lopez; Mariela A Blum Murphy; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher; Heath D Skinner; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jane E Rogers; Irene Thomas; Dipen M Maru; Ritsuko Komaki; Garrett Walsh; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 10.  [Pretherapeutic misclassification of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : Possibilities and clinical consequences].

Authors:  I Gockel; F Lordick; O Lyros; N Kreuser; A H Hölscher; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.