BACKGROUND: Using a bifurcated Y-graft as the Fontan baffle is hypothesized to streamline and improve flow dynamics through the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). This study conducted numerical simulations to evaluate this hypothesis using postoperative data from 5 patients. METHODS: Patients were imaged with cardiac magnetic resonance or computed tomography after receiving a bifurcated aorto-iliac Y-graft as their Fontan conduit. Numerical simulations were performed using in vivo flow rates, as well as 2 levels of simulated exercise. Two TCPC models were virtually created for each patient to serve as the basis for hemodynamic comparison. Comparative metrics included connection flow resistance and inferior vena caval flow distribution. RESULTS: Results demonstrate good hemodynamic outcomes for the Y-graft options. The consistency of inferior vena caval flow distribution was improved over TCPC controls, whereas the connection resistances were generally no different from the TCPC values, except for 1 case in which there was a marked improvement under both resting and exercise conditions. Examination of the connection hemodynamics as they relate to surgical Y-graft implementation identified critical strategies and modifications that are needed to potentially realize the theoretical efficiency of such bifurcated connection designs. CONCLUSIONS: Five consecutive patients received a Y-graft connection to complete their Fontan procedure with positive hemodynamic results. Refining the surgical technique for implementation should result in further energetic improvements that may help improve long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Using a bifurcated Y-graft as the Fontan baffle is hypothesized to streamline and improve flow dynamics through the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). This study conducted numerical simulations to evaluate this hypothesis using postoperative data from 5 patients. METHODS:Patients were imaged with cardiac magnetic resonance or computed tomography after receiving a bifurcated aorto-iliac Y-graft as their Fontan conduit. Numerical simulations were performed using in vivo flow rates, as well as 2 levels of simulated exercise. Two TCPC models were virtually created for each patient to serve as the basis for hemodynamic comparison. Comparative metrics included connection flow resistance and inferior vena caval flow distribution. RESULTS: Results demonstrate good hemodynamic outcomes for the Y-graft options. The consistency of inferior vena caval flow distribution was improved over TCPC controls, whereas the connection resistances were generally no different from the TCPC values, except for 1 case in which there was a marked improvement under both resting and exercise conditions. Examination of the connection hemodynamics as they relate to surgical Y-graft implementation identified critical strategies and modifications that are needed to potentially realize the theoretical efficiency of such bifurcated connection designs. CONCLUSIONS: Five consecutive patients received a Y-graft connection to complete their Fontan procedure with positive hemodynamic results. Refining the surgical technique for implementation should result in further energetic improvements that may help improve long-term outcomes.
Authors: Alison L Marsden; Irene E Vignon-Clementel; Frandics P Chan; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Charles A Taylor Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Dennis D Soerensen; Kerem Pekkan; Diane de Zélicourt; Shiva Sharma; Kirk Kanter; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Lakshmi P Dasi; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Colleen Sherwin; Diane de Zelicourt; Kirk Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-10-31 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: S Sharma; S Goudy; P Walker; S Panchal; A Ensley; K Kanter; V Tam; D Fyfe; A Yoganathan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: E M Pedersen; E V Stenbøg; T Fründ; K Houlind; O Kromann; K E Sørensen; K Emmertsen; V E Hjortdal Journal: Heart Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Diane A de Zélicourt; Christopher M Haggerty; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Brian S Whited; Jarek R Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Kevin K Whitehead; Kerem Pekkan; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Stephen M Paridon; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Diane A de Zélicourt; Maria Restrepo; Jarek Rossignac; Thomas L Spray; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Kalpi Desai; Christopher M Haggerty; Kirk R Kanter; Jarek Rossignac; Thomas L Spray; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2013-04-05
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Maria Restrepo; Elaine Tang; Diane A de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Lucia Mirabella; James Bethel; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Kevin K Whitehead; James Bethel; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.330