Literature DB >> 22777126

Comparing pre- and post-operative Fontan hemodynamic simulations: implications for the reliability of surgical planning.

Christopher M Haggerty1, Diane A de Zélicourt, Maria Restrepo, Jarek Rossignac, Thomas L Spray, Kirk R Kanter, Mark A Fogel, Ajit P Yoganathan.   

Abstract

Virtual modeling of cardiothoracic surgery is a new paradigm that allows for systematic exploration of various operative strategies and uses engineering principles to predict the optimal patient-specific plan. This study investigates the predictive accuracy of such methods for the surgical palliation of single ventricle heart defects. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based surgical planning was used to model the Fontan procedure for four patients prior to surgery. The objective for each was to identify the operative strategy that best distributed hepatic blood flow to the pulmonary arteries. Post-operative magnetic resonance data were acquired to compare (via CFD) the post-operative hemodynamics with predictions. Despite variations in physiologic boundary conditions (e.g., cardiac output, venous flows) and the exact geometry of the surgical baffle, sufficient agreement was observed with respect to hepatic flow distribution (90% confidence interval-14 ± 4.3% difference). There was also good agreement of flow-normalized energetic efficiency predictions (19 ± 4.8% error). The hemodynamic outcomes of prospective patient-specific surgical planning of the Fontan procedure are described for the first time with good quantitative comparisons between preoperatively predicted and postoperative simulations. These results demonstrate that surgical planning can be a useful tool for single ventricle cardiothoracic surgery with the ability to deliver significant clinical impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777126      PMCID: PMC3509262          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0614-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  28 in total

1.  Boundary conditions of patient-specific fluid dynamics modelling of cavopulmonary connections: possible adaptation of pulmonary resistances results in a critical issue for a virtual surgical planning.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pennati; Chiara Corsini; Daria Cosentino; Tain-Yen Hsia; Vincenzo S Luisi; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Cardiac rest and reserve function in patients with Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Hideaki Senzaki; Satoshi Masutani; Hirotaka Ishido; Mio Taketazu; Toshiki Kobayashi; Nozomu Sasaki; Haruhiko Asano; Toshiyuki Katogi; Shunei Kyo; Yuji Yokote
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Introduction of a new optimized total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  Dennis D Soerensen; Kerem Pekkan; Diane de Zélicourt; Shiva Sharma; Kirk Kanter; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations.

Authors:  Sethuraman Sankaran; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia.

Authors:  F Fontan; E Baudet
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Individualized computer-based surgical planning to address pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with a single ventricle with an interrupted inferior vena cava and azygous continuation.

Authors:  Diane A de Zélicourt; Christopher M Haggerty; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Brian S Whited; Jarek R Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparison of cardiopulmonary adaptation during exercise in children after the atriopulmonary and total cavopulmonary connection Fontan procedures.

Authors:  M Rosenthal; A Bush; J Deanfield; A Redington
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Total cavopulmonary connection: a logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex Fontan operations. Experimental studies and early clinical experience.

Authors:  M R de Leval; P Kilner; M Gewillig; C Bull
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Fontan hemodynamics: importance of pulmonary artery diameter.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Resmi Krishnankuttyrema; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Kerem Pekkan; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Mark Fogel; Shiva Sharma; Kevin Whitehead; Kirk Kanter; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Nonlinear power loss during exercise in single-ventricle patients after the Fontan: insights from computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Kevin K Whitehead; Kerem Pekkan; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Stephen M Paridon; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgical design: can we optimise the Fontan operation?

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.093

2.  Hemodynamic study of TCPC using in vivo and in vitro 4D Flow MRI and numerical simulation.

Authors:  Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Sylvana García-Rodríguez; Petros V Anagnostopoulos; Shardha Srinivasan; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Fontan hemodynamics from 100 patient-specific cardiac magnetic resonance studies: a computational fluid dynamics analysis.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Maria Restrepo; Elaine Tang; Diane A de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Lucia Mirabella; James Bethel; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Surgical planning of the total cavopulmonary connection: robustness analysis.

Authors:  Maria Restrepo; Mark Luffel; Jake Sebring; Kirk Kanter; Pedro Del Nido; Alessandro Veneziani; Jarek Rossignac; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Relationship of single ventricle filling and preload to total cavopulmonary connection hemodynamics.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Kevin K Whitehead; James Bethel; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Mike Tree; Christopher M Haggerty; Elaine Tang; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Computational modeling of Fontan physiology: at the crossroads of pediatric cardiology and biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Timothy C Slesnick; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Phillip M Trusty; Timothy C Slesnick; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Jarek Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Semi-Automatic Planning and Three-Dimensional Electrospinning of Patient-Specific Grafts for Fontan Surgery.

Authors:  Xiaolong Liu; Byeol Kim; Yue-Hin Loke; Paige Mass; Laura Olivieri; Narutoshi Hibino; Mark Fuge; Axel Krieger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Computational fluid dynamics models and congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pennati; Chiara Corsini; Tain-Yen Hsia; Francesco Migliavacca
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.