| Literature DB >> 35134949 |
S Samaneh Lashkarinia1, Murat Cicek2, Banu Kose3, Mohammad Rezaeimoghaddam1, Emine Hekim Yılmaz2, Numan Ali Aydemir2, Reza Rasooli1, Sercin Ozkok4, Nurgul Yurtseven5, Hasan Erdem6, Kerem Pekkan1, Ahmet Sasmazel2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hemodynamicdynamic advantage of a new Fontan surgical template that is intended for complex single-ventricle patients with interrupted inferior vena cava-azygos and hemi-azygos continuation. The new technique has emerged from a comprehensive pre-surgical simulation campaign conducted to facilitate a balanced hepatic flow and somatic Fontan pathway growth after Kawashima procedure.Entities:
Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; Extracardiac; Fontan procedure; Hemodynamics; Intratrial; Patient-specific analysis; Pre-surgical planning; Single ventricle; Total cavopulmonary connection; Y-graft
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35134949 PMCID: PMC9159461 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ISSN: 1569-9285
Demographic data of the patient cohort, information about the tested virtual surgery configurations, pre- and postoperative hepatic flow splits from computational fluid dynamics simulations and clinically measured pre- and postoperative oxygen saturation levels
| Patient | Age | BSA (m2) | Weight (kg) | sex | Bilateral SVC | Number of Surgical alternatives simulated | Number of Y-graft models simulated | Selected graft type |
| Pre-surgery hepatic flow | Post-op Hepatic flow | Pre-op Oxygen sat. (%) a | Post-op Oxygen sat. (%) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (%) | LPA/RPA | Total (%) | LPA/RPA | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 1.1 | 43 | M | Yes hemi-azy | 9 | 4 | Novel Y-graft | 10/14 | 46 | 15/31 | 100 | 31/69 | 73 | 91 |
| 2 | 14 | 1.2 | 37 | F | Yes hemi-azy | 3 | 3 | Novel Y-graft | 12/12 | 100 | 0/100 | 100 | 38/62 | 74 | 93 |
| 3 | 11 | 1.19 | 24 | M | No | 6 | 1 | Novel Y-graft | 10/14 | 0 | 0/0 | 100 | 33/67 | 80 | 89 |
| 4 | 13 | 1.3 | 31 | F | Yes hemi-azy | 4 | 1 | Novel Y-graft | 10/14 | 29 | 27/2 | 100 | 27/73 | 79 | 92 |
| 5 | 18 | 1.4 | 48 | F | Yes | 5 | 3 | Novel Y-graft | 10/14 | 12 | 7/5 | 100 | 39/61 | 80 | 92 |
| 6 | 7 | 0.7 | 17 | F | No | 3 | 2 | Novel Y-graft | 10/14 | 46 | 0/46 | 100 | 55/45 | 75 | 89 |
| 7 | 9 | 1.2 | 30 | F | No | 9 | 1 | HEP to AZY | 15 | 76 | 40/36 | 100 | 43/57 | 88 | 96 |
| 8 | 6 | 0.4 | 18 | M | No | 3 | 1 | Extra-cardiac | 14 | 100 | 67/33 | 90 | 95 | ||
| 9 | 2 | 0.3 | 10 | F | No | 4 | 2 | Extra-cardiac | 14 | 100 | 50/50 | 87 | 94 | ||
Oxygen saturation increased statically, but significantly (P-value = 0.00009) to normal levels in 1-year postoperative follow-up. Pre-surgery hepatic flow is the part that is delivered to the lungs. Pre-surgery three-dimensional reconstructions and CFD results of all surgical alternatives simulated are provided in Supplementary Material, S1. In this cohort, all patients were at post-Glenn stage at the time of computational planning. Patients are recruited in the following order: 7-1-3-4-2-5-6-8-9.
AZY: azygos vein; CFD: computational fluid dynamics; HEP: hepatic veins; LPA: left pulmonary artery; PA: pulmonary artery; RPA: right pulmonary artery; SVC: superior vena cava; BSA: Body surface area.
Specifications of tested models and summary of computational fluid dynamics simulation results for Patient 1
| Case name | Baffle type | D (m) | Baffle offset (mm) | SVC offset (mm) | Hepatic flow distribution (%) | Total flow distribution (%) | Power loss (mW) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | Right | Left | Right | ||||||||
| Pre-surgery | |||||||||||
| | No baffle | 15 | 31 | 22 | 78 | 25 | |||||
| Surgical planning scenarios | |||||||||||
| | Extracardiac | 14 | Left | 86 | 14 | 44 | 56 | 22 | |||
| | Extracardiac | 14 | 26 | 74 | 43 | 57 | 19.9 | ||||
| | HEP to AZY | 12 | 52 | 48 | 48 | 52 | 113.4 | ||||
| | HEP to AZY | 14 | 48 | 52 | 47 | 53 | 98.6 | ||||
| | HEP to AZY | 14 | 13/Right | 64 | 36 | 46 | 54 | 100.9 | |||
| | Y-graft | 15 | 85 | 41 | 59 | 23.9 | |||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 12 | ||||||||||
| | Y-graft | 8/ Left | 90 | 10 | 47 | 53 | 28 | ||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 12 | ||||||||||
| | Y-graft (Selected) | 31 | 69 | 44 | 56 | 30 | |||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 10 | ||||||||||
| | Y-graft | 27 | 73 | 43 | 57 | 35.1 | |||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 8 | ||||||||||
| Growth estimation (scale factor= 1.2) | |||||||||||
| | Y-graft (Selected) | 35 | 65 | 48 | 52 | 21 | |||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 10 | ||||||||||
| | Y-graft | 30 | 70 | 47 | 53 | 23.2 | |||||
| HEP to AZY | 14 | ||||||||||
| HEP to PA | 8 | ||||||||||
| Post-surgery | |||||||||||
| | Y-graft | 32 | 68 | 58 | 42 | 15 | |||||
|
| 14 | ||||||||||
|
| 10 | ||||||||||
Each surgical template subgroup is shown in a different. Patient 1_7 corresponds to the seventh numerically simulated pre-surgical alternative considered for Patient 1. Two estimates of lumen growth (G1 and G2) are also tested to verify long-term hemodynamicdynamics. Computational simulation results of the actual postoperative configuration obtained from post-op MRI is also provided (Patient 1_Post).
AZY: azygos vein; HEP: hepatic veins; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PA: pulmonary artery; SVC: superior vena cava.
Figure 1:(A) Pulmonary angiogram of Patient 1, displaying left pulmonary arteriovenous fistula. (B) Novel Y-graft template for directing HEP flow to AZY and PA bed. (C) Surgical layout during the implantation of two 10–14 mm Y-grafts. AZY: azygos vein; HEP: hepatic veins; PA: pulmonary artery.
Figure 2:Computational fluid dynamics simulations of (A, D) pre-surgery, (B, E) selected eighth surgical alternative (Patient 1_8) and (C, F) post-surgery model. First row shows the streamlines of inflows in different colours (A–C). Hepatic flow split is shown in red colour. Second row indicates the velocity streamlines and total venous flow splits to the lungs (D–F). Quantified flow splits to the lungs are reported in percentages.
Figure 3:The general characteristics of the 3 main surgical templates are illustrated through numerical simulations. The extracardiac template (Patient 1_1) had the lowest pressure levels but with very poor HEP flow split (86/14). While the direct HEP to AZY shunt (Patient 1_4) would allow for balanced HEP flow (48/52), it led to unacceptably high venous pressure levels. The new modified Y-graft (Patient 1_8) demonstrated optimal values for hepatic flow (31/69) and venous pressure. Patient 1_8 corresponds to the eighth surgical alternative of the first patient. AZY: azygos vein; HEP: hepatic veins.
Figure 4:Three Y-graft configurations (Table 2) are compared in terms of HEP flow splits (shown in red colour, A, B and C), pressure level (D, E and F, respectively) and power loss. The HEP to AZY branch is 14 mm in all models and the HEP to PA branch size varies between 8 and 12 mm. Flow splits to the lungs are computed from computational fluid dynamics simulations and reported in percentages. AZY: azygos vein; HEP: hepatic veins.
Figure 5:Effect of branch angle of the HEP to AZY graft (Graft 2) in flow pattern illustrated via numerical simulation results. First column indicates the velocity streamlines and total venous flow splits to the lungs. Second column shows the streamlines of inflows in different colours. Hepatic flow split is shown in red colour. Third column shows the computed pressure level. Quantified flow splits to the lungs are reported in percentages. (A) Orienting the HEP to AZY graft (Graft 2) in cranial direction was associated with directing 38% HEP flow to AZY. (B) Graft 2 in caudal direction from HEP to AZY failed to conduct the HEP flow to AZY and 3% retrograde flow from AZY to extracardiac baffle was observed. AZY: azygos vein; HEP: hepatic veins.