Literature DB >> 24507891

Fontan hemodynamics from 100 patient-specific cardiac magnetic resonance studies: a computational fluid dynamics analysis.

Christopher M Haggerty1, Maria Restrepo1, Elaine Tang1, Diane A de Zélicourt2, Kartik S Sundareswaran1, Lucia Mirabella1, James Bethel3, Kevin K Whitehead4, Mark A Fogel4, Ajit P Yoganathan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify average hemodynamic metrics of the Fontan connection as reference for future investigations, compare connection types (intra-atrial vs extracardiac), and identify functional correlates using computational fluid dynamics in a large patient-specific cohort. Fontan hemodynamics, particularly power losses, are hypothesized to vary considerably among patients with a single ventricle and adversely affect systemic hemodynamics and ventricular function if suboptimal.
METHODS: Fontan connection models were created from cardiac magnetic resonance scans for 100 patients. Phase velocity cardiac magnetic resonance in the aorta, vena cavae, and pulmonary arteries was used to prescribe patient-specific time-averaged flow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics with a customized, validated solver. Comparison with 4-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance velocity data from selected patients was used to provide additional verification of simulations. Indexed Fontan power loss, connection resistance, and hepatic flow distribution were quantified and correlated with systemic patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Indexed power loss varied by 2 orders of magnitude, whereas, on average, Fontan resistance was 15% to 20% of published values of pulmonary vascular resistance in single ventricles. A significant inverse relationship was observed between indexed power loss and both systemic venous flow and cardiac index. Comparison by connection type showed no differences between intra-atrial and extracardiac connections. Instead, the least efficient connections revealed adverse consequences from localized Fontan pathway stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Fontan power loss varies from patient to patient, and elevated levels are correlated with lower systemic flow and cardiac index. Fontan connection type does not influence hemodynamic efficiency, but an undersized or stenosed Fontan pathway or pulmonary arteries can be highly dissipative.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24507891      PMCID: PMC6815671          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  33 in total

1.  New techniques for the reconstruction of complex vascular anatomies from MRI images.

Authors:  David H Frakes; Mark J T Smith; James Parks; Shiva Sharma; S Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Cardiac rest and reserve function in patients with Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Hideaki Senzaki; Satoshi Masutani; Hirotaka Ishido; Mio Taketazu; Toshiki Kobayashi; Nozomu Sasaki; Haruhiko Asano; Toshiyuki Katogi; Shunei Kyo; Yuji Yokote
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Fontan operation: a comparison of lateral tunnel with extracardiac conduit.

Authors:  Andrew C Fiore; Mark Turrentine; Mark Rodefeld; Palaniswamy Vijay; Theresa L Schwartz; Katherine S Virgo; Laurice K Fischer; John W Brown
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Evaluation of a novel Y-shaped extracardiac Fontan baffle using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden; Adam J Bernstein; V Mohan Reddy; Shawn C Shadden; Ryan L Spilker; Frandics P Chan; Charles A Taylor; Jeffrey A Feinstein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Predictors of outcome after the Fontan operation: is hypoplastic left heart syndrome still a risk factor?

Authors:  J William Gaynor; Nancy D Bridges; Mitchell I Cohen; William T Mahle; William M Decampli; James M Steven; Susan C Nicolson; Thomas L Spray
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  In vitro flow experiments for determination of optimal geometry of total cavopulmonary connection for surgical repair of children with functional single ventricle.

Authors:  S Sharma; S Goudy; P Walker; S Panchal; A Ensley; K Kanter; V Tam; D Fyfe; A Yoganathan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Visualization of flow structures in Fontan patients using 3-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kartik S Sundareswaran; Christopher M Haggerty; Diane de Zélicourt; Lakshmi P Dasi; Kerem Pekkan; David H Frakes; Andrew J Powell; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Simulating hemodynamics of the Fontan Y-graft based on patient-specific in vivo connections.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Kirk R Kanter; Maria Restrepo; Diane A de Zélicourt; W James Parks; Jarek Rossignac; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Fontan hemodynamics: importance of pulmonary artery diameter.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Resmi Krishnankuttyrema; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Kerem Pekkan; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Mark Fogel; Shiva Sharma; Kevin Whitehead; Kirk Kanter; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  23 in total

1.  The Fontan extracardiac conduit: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Frank Cetta; Harold M Burkhart
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-07

2.  The effect of resolution on viscous dissipation measured with 4D flow MRI in patients with Fontan circulation: Evaluation using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Merih Cibis; Kelly Jarvis; Michael Markl; Michael Rose; Cynthia Rigsby; Alex J Barker; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Surgical planning of the total cavopulmonary connection: robustness analysis.

Authors:  Maria Restrepo; Mark Luffel; Jake Sebring; Kirk Kanter; Pedro Del Nido; Alessandro Veneziani; Jarek Rossignac; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Relationship of single ventricle filling and preload to total cavopulmonary connection hemodynamics.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Kevin K Whitehead; James Bethel; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Computational Fluid Dynamics and Additive Manufacturing to Diagnose and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Amanda Randles; David H Frakes; Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Mike Tree; Christopher M Haggerty; Elaine Tang; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  New imaging tools in cardiovascular medicine: computational fluid dynamics and 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Keiichi Itatani; Shohei Miyazaki; Tokoki Furusawa; Satoshi Numata; Sachiko Yamazaki; Kazuki Morimoto; Rina Makino; Hiroko Morichi; Teruyasu Nishino; Hitoshi Yaku
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-19

8.  Role of surgeon intuition and computer-aided design in Fontan optimization: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Yue-Hin Loke; Byeol Kim; Paige Mass; Justin D Opfermann; Narutoshi Hibino; Axel Krieger; Laura Olivieri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  The Advantages of Viscous Dissipation Rate over Simplified Power Loss as a Fontan Hemodynamic Metric.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Michael Tree; Phillip M Trusty; Wenjun Wu; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Modeling Physiological Flow Variation in Fontan Models with 4d Flow Mri, Particle Image Velocimetry, and Arterial Spin Labeling.

Authors:  David Rutkowski; Rafael Medero; Timothy Ruesink; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.