PURPOSE: The authors present a calibration method for a prototype proton computed tomography (pCT) scanner. The accuracy of these measurements depends upon careful calibration of the energy detector used to measure the residual energy of the protons that passed through the object. METHODS: A prototype pCT scanner with a cesium iodide (CsI(Tl)) crystal calorimeter was calibrated by measuring the calorimeter response for protons of 200 and 100 MeV initial energies undergoing degradation in polystyrene plates of known thickness and relative stopping power (RSP) with respect to water. Calibration curves for the two proton energies were obtained by fitting a second-degree polynomial to the water-equivalent path length versus calorimeter response data. Using the 100 MeV calibration curve, the RSP values for a variety of tissue-equivalent materials were measured and compared to values obtained from a standard depth-dose range shift measurement using a water-tank. A cylindrical water phantom was scanned with 200 MeV protons and its RSP distribution was reconstructed using the 200 MeV calibration. RESULTS: It is shown that this calibration method produces measured RSP values of various tissue-equivalent materials that agree to within 0.5% of values obtained using an established water-tank method. The mean RSP value of the water phantom reconstruction was found to be 0.995 ± 0.006. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented provides a simple and reliable procedure for calibration of a pCT scanner.
PURPOSE: The authors present a calibration method for a prototype proton computed tomography (pCT) scanner. The accuracy of these measurements depends upon careful calibration of the energy detector used to measure the residual energy of the protons that passed through the object. METHODS: A prototype pCT scanner with a cesium iodide (CsI(Tl)) crystal calorimeter was calibrated by measuring the calorimeter response for protons of 200 and 100 MeV initial energies undergoing degradation in polystyrene plates of known thickness and relative stopping power (RSP) with respect to water. Calibration curves for the two proton energies were obtained by fitting a second-degree polynomial to the water-equivalent path length versus calorimeter response data. Using the 100 MeV calibration curve, the RSP values for a variety of tissue-equivalent materials were measured and compared to values obtained from a standard depth-dose range shift measurement using a water-tank. A cylindrical water phantom was scanned with 200 MeV protons and its RSP distribution was reconstructed using the 200 MeV calibration. RESULTS: It is shown that this calibration method produces measured RSP values of various tissue-equivalent materials that agree to within 0.5% of values obtained using an established water-tank method. The mean RSP value of the water phantom reconstruction was found to be 0.995 ± 0.006. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented provides a simple and reliable procedure for calibration of a pCT scanner.
Authors: Tianfang Li; Zhengrong Liang; Jayalakshmi V Singanallur; Todd J Satogata; David C Williams; Reinhard W Schulte Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: J Besserer; J de Boer; M Dellert; C Gahn; M Moosburger; E Pedroni; P Pemler; U Schneider; H Stäuble Journal: Biomed Tech (Berl) Date: 1997 Impact factor: 1.411
Authors: K M Hanson; J N Bradbury; T M Cannon; R L Hutson; D B Laubacher; R J Macek; M A Paciotti; C A Taylor Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 1981-11 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Uwe Schneider; Jürgen Besserer; Peter Pemler; Matthias Dellert; Martin Moosburger; Eros Pedroni; Barbara Kaser-Hotz Journal: Med Phys Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: V A Bashkirov; R W Schulte; R F Hurley; R P Johnson; H F-W Sadrozinski; A Zatserklyaniy; T Plautz; V Giacometti Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Indrin J Chetty; Mary K Martel; David A Jaffray; Stanley H Benedict; Stephen M Hahn; Ross Berbeco; James Deye; Robert Jeraj; Brian Kavanagh; Sunil Krishnan; Nancy Lee; Daniel A Low; David Mankoff; Lawrence B Marks; Daniel Ollendorf; Harald Paganetti; Brian Ross; Ramon Alfredo C Siochi; Robert D Timmerman; John W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: H F-W Sadrozinski; T Geoghegan; E Harvey; R P Johnson; T E Plautz; A Zatserklyaniy; V Bashkirov; R F Hurley; P Piersimoni; R W Schulte; P Karbasi; K E Schubert; B Schultze; V Giacometti Journal: Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Date: 2016-02-07 Impact factor: 1.455
Authors: Tia Plautz; V Bashkirov; V Feng; F Hurley; R P Johnson; C Leary; S Macafee; A Plumb; V Rykalin; H F-W Sadrozinski; K Schubert; R Schulte; B Schultze; D Steinberg; M Witt; A Zatserklyaniy Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Vladimir A Bashkirov; Robert P Johnson; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; Reinhard W Schulte Journal: Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 1.455
Authors: Robert P Johnson; Vladimir Bashkirov; Langley DeWitt; Valentina Giacometti; Robert F Hurley; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Tia E Plautz; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; Keith Schubert; Reinhard Schulte; Blake Schultze; Andriy Zatserklyaniy Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 1.679