Literature DB >> 25520941

New developments in treatment planning and verification of particle beam therapy.

Reinhard W Schulte1, Andrew J Wroe1.   

Abstract

Charged particle beam therapy has been used for almost 60 years. During the initial 40 years, the medical use of protons and heavy ions was explored at accelerator laboratories in a limited number of patients and for a limited number of cancerous and non-cancerous disease conditions. After the development of computed tomography and 3D treatment planning, it was time to move charged particle therapy into the clinical realm. This happened in October 1991 when an ocular melanoma patient became the first patient to be treated at Loma Linda University Medical Center in California. Due to the increased awareness of the advantages of charged particle therapy and promising results of single-institution experiences, one currently observes a phase of rapid expansion of proton treatment centers throughout the world. A few of these centers are combined proton/carbon ion facilities. It is very important that the technological evolution of charged particle therapy will continue during this phase of clinical expansion to ensure that the increasing number of patients exposed to therapeutic charged particles will benefit most from the advantageous dose distributions that these particles afford. This report will give an overview of translational research activities related to planning and verification of proton therapy in which the authors have been involved for a number of years. While our activities focus on protons, these developments are to a large degree also applicable to carbon ion therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proton therapy; immobilization; proton computed tomography; range verification

Year:  2012        PMID: 25520941      PMCID: PMC4266163          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2012.10.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


  27 in total

1.  The measurement of proton stopping power using proton-cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Zygmanski; K P Gall; M S Rabin; S J Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  G T Chen; R P Singh; J R Castro; J T Lyman; J M Quivey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: the report of ASTRO's emerging technology committee.

Authors:  Aaron M Allen; Todd Pawlicki; Lei Dong; Eugene Fourkal; Mark Buyyounouski; Keith Cengel; John Plastaras; Mary K Bucci; Torunn I Yock; Luisa Bonilla; Robert Price; Eleanor E Harris; Andre A Konski
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  The most likely path of an energetic charged particle through a uniform medium.

Authors:  D C Williams
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Total variation superiorization schemes in proton computed tomography image reconstruction.

Authors:  S N Penfold; R W Schulte; Y Censor; A B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties.

Authors:  A J Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Thomas Bortfeld; Benjamin C Martin; Martin Soukup
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Water-equivalent path length calibration of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  R F Hurley; R W Schulte; V A Bashkirov; A J Wroe; A Ghebremedhin; H F-W Sadrozinski; V Rykalin; G Coutrakon; P Koss; B Patyal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Urie; M Goitein; M Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ted C Ling; Joseph I Kang; David A Bush; Jerry D Slater; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Secondary Particle Interactions in a Compton Camera Designed for in vivo Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Panthi; Paul Maggi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Jerimy Polf; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-12

3.  Water equivalent thickness analysis of immobilization devices for clinical implementation in proton therapy.

Authors:  A J Wroe; A Ghebremedhin; I R Gordon; R W Schulte; J D Slater
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31

4.  A Monte Carlo feasibility study for neutron based real-time range verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge; Kyrre Skjerdal; John Mattingly; Ilker Meric
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.