Literature DB >> 10723215

The perceived position of the hand in space.

P Haggard1, C Newman, J Blundell, H Andrew.   

Abstract

This paper reports a series of experiments of the perceived position of the hand in egocentric space. The experiments focused on the bias in the proprioceptively perceived position of the hand at a series of locations spanning the midline from left to right. Perceived position was tested in a matching paradigm, in which subjects indicated the perceived position of a target, which could have been either a visual stimulus or their own fingertip, by placing the index finger of the other hand in the corresponding location on the other side of a fixed surface. Both the constant error, or bias, and the variable error, or consistency of matching attempts, were measured. Experiment 1 showed that (1) there is a far-left advantage in matching tasks, such that errors in perceived position are significantly lower in extreme-left positions than in extreme-right positions, and (2) there is a strong hand-bias effect in the absence of vision, such that the perceived positions of the left and right index fingertips held in the same actual target position in fact differ significantly. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this hand-bias effect is genuinely due to errors in the perceived position of the matched hand, and not to the attempt at matching it with the other hand. These results suggest that there is no unifying representation of egocentric, proprioceptive space. Rather, separate representations appear to be maintained for each effector. The bias of these representations may reflect the motor function of that effector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10723215     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  40 in total

1.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of visually induced expectation on perceived motor effort: a visual-proprioceptive interaction at the Santa Cruz Mystery Spot.

Authors:  Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

4.  Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Masashi Nakatani; Hideyuki Ando; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensory reweighting in targeted reaching: effects of conscious effort, error history, and target salience.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Proprioceptive integration and body representation: insights into dancers' expertise.

Authors:  Corinne Jola; Angharad Davis; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Virtual lesion of angular gyrus disrupts the relationship between visuoproprioceptive weighting and realignment.

Authors:  Hannah Block; Amy Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.