E M Donovan1, I Castellano, S Eagle, E Harris. 1. Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. Ellen.Donovan@icr.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to formulate a practical method for the use of cone beam CT (CBCT) for the verification of sequential and integrated tumour bed boosts for early breast cancer patients. METHODS: Partial arc scan geometries were assessed on a treatment unit. Imaging dose measurements on an Elekta Synergy CBCT system were made in a CT dose phantom for scan parameters 100 kV, 25 mA and 40 ms with an S20 collimator. The protocol was used to verify the setup of a cohort of 38 patients, all of whom had surgical clips inserted in the tumour bed. Setup errors with and without an extended no action level (eNAL) protocol were calculated. RESULTS: Arcs from 260° to 85° (left breast) and 185° to 15° (right breast) were found sufficient to image fiducial markers and anatomy whilst accounting for the physical limits of the equipment. A single treatment and imaging isocentre was found by applying simple constraints: isocentre <8 cm from midline and isocentre-couch distance <30 cm. Contralateral breast doses were ∼2 mGy per scan (right breast) and ∼12 mGy (left breast). Both mean population systematic error and mean population random error were 3 mm prior to correction. The systematic error reduced to 1.5 mm using an eNAL correction protocol, implying that a 5-mm setup margin could be achieved. CONCLUSION: An image-guided verification protocol using CBCT for breast cancer boost plans was implemented successfully. Setup errors were reduced with an acceptable imaging dose to the contralateral breast.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to formulate a practical method for the use of cone beam CT (CBCT) for the verification of sequential and integrated tumour bed boosts for early breast cancer patients. METHODS: Partial arc scan geometries were assessed on a treatment unit. Imaging dose measurements on an Elekta Synergy CBCT system were made in a CT dose phantom for scan parameters 100 kV, 25 mA and 40 ms with an S20 collimator. The protocol was used to verify the setup of a cohort of 38 patients, all of whom had surgical clips inserted in the tumour bed. Setup errors with and without an extended no action level (eNAL) protocol were calculated. RESULTS: Arcs from 260° to 85° (left breast) and 185° to 15° (right breast) were found sufficient to image fiducial markers and anatomy whilst accounting for the physical limits of the equipment. A single treatment and imaging isocentre was found by applying simple constraints: isocentre <8 cm from midline and isocentre-couch distance <30 cm. Contralateral breast doses were ∼2 mGy per scan (right breast) and ∼12 mGy (left breast). Both mean population systematic error and mean population random error were 3 mm prior to correction. The systematic error reduced to 1.5 mm using an eNAL correction protocol, implying that a 5-mm setup margin could be achieved. CONCLUSION: An image-guided verification protocol using CBCT for breast cancer boost plans was implemented successfully. Setup errors were reduced with an acceptable imaging dose to the contralateral breast.
Authors: Stefan Ueltzhöffer; Piotr Zygmanski; Jürgen Hesser; Wolfgang Högele; Julia Wong; Jennifer R Bellon; Yulia Lyatskaya Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ellen M Donovan; Laura Ciurlionis; Jamie Fairfoul; Hayley James; Helen Mayles; Sophie Manktelow; Sanjay Raj; Yat Tsang; Nicola Tywman; John Yarnold; Charlotte Coles Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas Mulliez; Akos Gulyban; Tom Vercauteren; Annick van Greveling; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Liv Veldeman Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Nicolle Dunkerley; Frederick R Bartlett; Anna M Kirby; Philip M Evans; Ellen M Donovan Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Pieter Deseyne; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Bert Boute; Leen Paelinck; Vincent Vakaet; Hans Van Hulle; Max Schoepen; Michael Stouthandel; Annick Van Greveling; Giselle Post; Jan Detand; Chris Monten; Herman Depypere; Liv Veldeman Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 4.379