Literature DB >> 22544274

Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), but not Pol II, dynamically switches with a stalled Pol III* replicase.

Justin M H Heltzel1, Robert W Maul, David W Wolff, Mark D Sutton.   

Abstract

The dnaN159 allele encodes a temperature-sensitive mutant form of the β sliding clamp (β159). SOS-induced levels of DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) confer UV sensitivity upon the dnaN159 strain, while levels of Pol IV ∼4-fold higher than those induced by the SOS response severely impede its growth. Here, we used mutations in Pol IV that disrupted specific interactions with the β clamp to test our hypothesis that these phenotypes were the result of Pol IV gaining inappropriate access to the replication fork via a Pol III*-Pol IV switch relying on both the rim and cleft of the clamp. Our results clearly demonstrate that Pol IV relied on both the clamp rim and cleft interactions for these phenotypes. In contrast to the case for Pol IV, elevated levels of the other Pols, including Pol II, which was expressed at levels ∼8-fold higher than the normal SOS-induced levels, failed to impede growth of the dnaN159 strain. These findings suggest that the mechanism used by Pol IV to switch with Pol III* is distinct from those used by the other Pols. Results of experiments utilizing purified components to reconstitute the Pol III*-Pol II switch in vitro indicated that Pol II switched equally well with both a stalled and an actively replicating Pol III* in a manner that was independent of the rim contact required by Pol IV. These results provide compelling support for the Pol III*-Pol IV two-step switch model and demonstrate important mechanistic differences in how Pol IV and Pol II switch with Pol III*.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22544274      PMCID: PMC3393496          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00520-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  49 in total

1.  Mutant forms of the Escherichia colibeta sliding clamp that distinguish between its roles in replication and DNA polymerase V-dependent translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Jill M Duzen; Robert W Maul
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  A bipartite polymerase-processivity factor interaction: only the internal beta binding site of the alpha subunit is required for processive replication by the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme.

Authors:  Paul R Dohrmann; Charles S McHenry
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Role of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I in conferring viability upon the dnaN159 mutant strain.

Authors:  Robert W Maul; Laurie H Sanders; James B Lim; Rosemary Benitez; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork.

Authors:  George-Lucian Moldovan; Boris Pfander; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A rapid method for cloning mutagenic DNA repair genes: isolation of umu-complementing genes from multidrug resistance plasmids R391, R446b, and R471a.

Authors:  C Ho; O I Kulaeva; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Specific amino acid residues in the beta sliding clamp establish a DNA polymerase usage hierarchy in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Jill M Duzen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-12-09

7.  The RecF protein antagonizes RecX function via direct interaction.

Authors:  Shelley L Lusetti; Michael D Hobbs; Elizabeth A Stohl; Sindhu Chitteni-Pattu; Ross B Inman; H Steven Seifert; Michael M Cox
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Roles of the Escherichia coli RecA protein and the global SOS response in effecting DNA polymerase selection in vivo.

Authors:  Robert W Maul; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Specific RecA amino acid changes affect RecA-UmuD'C interaction.

Authors:  S Sommer; F Boudsocq; R Devoret; A Bailone
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection.

Authors:  Tomoya Baba; Takeshi Ara; Miki Hasegawa; Yuki Takai; Yoshiko Okumura; Miki Baba; Kirill A Datsenko; Masaru Tomita; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  29 in total

1.  Replisome-mediated translesion synthesis and leading strand template lesion skipping are competing bypass mechanisms.

Authors:  Carolina B Gabbai; Joseph T P Yeeles; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Selection of dinB alleles suppressing survival loss upon dinB overexpression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ryan W Benson; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Thomas J Rands; Ida Lin; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  DNA Polymerase III, but Not Polymerase IV, Must Be Bound to a τ-Containing DnaX Complex to Enable Exchange into Replication Forks.

Authors:  Quan Yuan; Paul R Dohrmann; Mark D Sutton; Charles S McHenry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Specialised DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli: roles within multiple pathways.

Authors:  Sarah S Henrikus; Antoine M van Oijen; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Bacteria-to-Human Protein Networks Reveal Origins of Endogenous DNA Damage.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Li-Ya Chiu; Ralf B Nehring; María Angélica Bravo Núñez; Qian Mei; Mercedes Perez; Yin Zhai; Devon M Fitzgerald; John P Pribis; Yumeng Wang; Chenyue W Hu; Reid T Powell; Sandra A LaBonte; Ali Jalali; Meztli L Matadamas Guzmán; Alfred M Lentzsch; Adam T Szafran; Mohan C Joshi; Megan Richters; Janet L Gibson; Ryan L Frisch; P J Hastings; David Bates; Christine Queitsch; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Cristian Coarfa; James C Hu; Deborah A Siegele; Kenneth L Scott; Han Liang; Michael A Mancini; Christophe Herman; Kyle M Miller; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  An underlying mechanism for the increased mutagenesis of lagging-strand genes in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Samuel Million-Weaver; Ariana N Samadpour; Daniela A Moreno-Habel; Patrick Nugent; Mitchell J Brittnacher; Eli Weiss; Hillary S Hayden; Samuel I Miller; Ivan Liachko; Houra Merrikh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Mutant βE202K Sliding Clamp Protein Impairs DNA Polymerase III Replication Activity.

Authors:  Caleb Homiski; Michelle K Scotland; Vignesh M P Babu; Sundari Chodavarapu; Robert W Maul; Jon M Kaguni; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Compartmentalization of the replication fork by single-stranded DNA-binding protein regulates translesion synthesis.

Authors:  Seungwoo Chang; Elizabeth S Thrall; Luisa Laureti; Sadie C Piatt; Vincent Pagès; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 18.361

9.  During Translesion Synthesis, Escherichia coli DinB89 (T120P) Alters Interactions of DinB (Pol IV) with Pol III Subunit Assemblies and SSB, but Not with the β Clamp.

Authors:  Michelle K Scotland; Caleb Homiski; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.476

10.  RecA acts as a switch to regulate polymerase occupancy in a moving replication fork.

Authors:  Chiara Indiani; Meghna Patel; Myron F Goodman; Mike E O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.