Literature DB >> 25301949

Replisome-mediated translesion synthesis and leading strand template lesion skipping are competing bypass mechanisms.

Carolina B Gabbai1, Joseph T P Yeeles1, Kenneth J Marians2.   

Abstract

A number of different enzymatic pathways have evolved to ensure that DNA replication can proceed past template base damage. These pathways include lesion skipping by the replisome, replication fork regression followed by either correction of the damage and origin-independent replication restart or homologous recombination-mediated restart of replication downstream of the lesion, and bypass of the damage by a translesion synthesis DNA polymerase. We report here that of two translesion synthesis polymerases tested, only DNA polymerase IV, not DNA polymerase II, could engage productively with the Escherichia coli replisome to bypass leading strand template damage, despite the fact that both enzymes are shown to be interacting with the replicase. Inactivation of the 3' → 5' proofreading exonuclease of DNA polymerase II did not enable bypass. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV required its ability to interact with the β clamp and act as a translesion polymerase but did not require its "little finger" domain, a secondary region of interaction with the β clamp. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV came at the expense of the inherent leading strand lesion skipping activity of the replisome, indicating that they are competing reactions.
© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA Damage; DNA Polymerase; DNA Repair; DNA Replication; Genomic Instability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301949      PMCID: PMC4239630          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.613257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  50 in total

1.  Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), but not Pol II, dynamically switches with a stalled Pol III* replicase.

Authors:  Justin M H Heltzel; Robert W Maul; David W Wolff; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The disposition of nascent strands at stalled replication forks dictates the pathway of replisome loading during restart.

Authors:  Ryan C Heller; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  A sliding-clamp toolbelt binds high- and low-fidelity DNA polymerases simultaneously.

Authors:  Chiara Indiani; Peter McInerney; Roxana Georgescu; Myron F Goodman; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Structure of a sliding clamp on DNA.

Authors:  Roxana E Georgescu; Seung-Sup Kim; Olga Yurieva; John Kuriyan; Xiang-Peng Kong; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  DNA replicases from a bacterial perspective.

Authors:  Charles S McHenry
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially.

Authors:  Sankalp Gupta; Joseph T P Yeeles; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A new form of DNA polymerase 3 and a copolymerase replicate a long, single-stranded primer-template.

Authors:  W Wickner; R Schekman; K Geider; A Kornberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S R Kim; K Matsui; M Yamada; P Gruz; T Nohmi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V.

Authors:  M Tang; X Shen; E G Frank; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  DNA polymerase IV mediates efficient and quick recovery of replication forks stalled at N2-dG adducts.

Authors:  Mio Ikeda; Asako Furukohri; Gaelle Philippin; Edward Loechler; Masahiro Tatsumi Akiyama; Tsutomu Katayama; Robert P Fuchs; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

1.  DNA Polymerase III, but Not Polymerase IV, Must Be Bound to a τ-Containing DnaX Complex to Enable Exchange into Replication Forks.

Authors:  Quan Yuan; Paul R Dohrmann; Mark D Sutton; Charles S McHenry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Specialised DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli: roles within multiple pathways.

Authors:  Sarah S Henrikus; Antoine M van Oijen; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.

Authors:  Seungwoo Chang; Karel Naiman; Elizabeth S Thrall; James E Kath; Slobodan Jergic; Nicholas E Dixon; Robert P Fuchs; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Two components of DNA replication-dependent LexA cleavage.

Authors:  Kamila K Myka; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Replisome structure suggests mechanism for continuous fork progression and post-replication repair.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Michael M Seidman; W Dean Rupp; Yang Gao
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

6.  Replisome-mediated translesion synthesis by a cellular replicase.

Authors:  Philip Nevin; Carolina C Gabbai; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The recombination mediator proteins RecFOR maintain RecA* levels for maximal DNA polymerase V Mut activity.

Authors:  Paromita Raychaudhury; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  RecA-independent recombination: Dependence on the Escherichia coli RarA protein.

Authors:  Kanika Jain; Elizabeth A Wood; Zachary J Romero; Michael M Cox
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.979

9.  A Genetic Selection for dinB Mutants Reveals an Interaction between DNA Polymerase IV and the Replicative Polymerase That Is Required for Translesion Synthesis.

Authors:  Michelle K Scotland; Justin M H Heltzel; James E Kath; Jung-Suk Choi; Anthony J Berdis; Joseph J Loparo; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Replicative DNA polymerase δ but not ε proofreads errors in Cis and in Trans.

Authors:  Carrie L Flood; Gina P Rodriguez; Gaobin Bao; Arthur H Shockley; Yoke Wah Kow; Gray F Crouse
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.