Literature DB >> 35285726

During Translesion Synthesis, Escherichia coli DinB89 (T120P) Alters Interactions of DinB (Pol IV) with Pol III Subunit Assemblies and SSB, but Not with the β Clamp.

Michelle K Scotland1, Caleb Homiski1, Mark D Sutton1.   

Abstract

Translesion synthesis (TLS) by specialized DNA polymerases (Pols) is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for tolerating replication-blocking DNA lesions. Using the Escherichia coli dinB-encoded Pol IV as a model to understand how TLS is coordinated with the actions of the high-fidelity Pol III replicase, we previously described a novel Pol IV mutant containing a threonine 120-to-proline mutation (Pol IV-T120P) that failed to exchange places with Pol III at the replication fork in vitro as part of a Pol III-Pol IV switch. This in vitro defect correlated with the inability of Pol IV-T120P to support TLS in vivo, suggesting Pol IV gains access to the DNA, at least in part, via a Pol III-Pol IV switch. Interaction of Pol IV with the β sliding clamp and the single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) significantly stimulates Pol IV replication and facilitates its access to the DNA. In this work, we demonstrate that Pol IV interacts physically with Pol III. We further show that Pol IV-T120P interacts normally with the β clamp, but is impaired in interactions with the α catalytic and εθ proofreading subunits of Pol III, as well as SSB. Taken together with published work, these results provide strong support for the model in which Pol IV-Pol III and Pol IV-SSB interactions help to regulate the access of Pol IV to the DNA. Finally, we describe several additional E. coli Pol-Pol interactions, suggesting Pol-Pol interactions play fundamental roles in coordinating bacterial DNA replication, DNA repair, and TLS. IMPORTANCE Specialized DNA polymerases (Pols) capable of catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS) generate mutations that contribute to bacterial virulence, pathoadaptation, and antimicrobial resistance. One mechanism by which the bacterial TLS Pol IV gains access to the DNA to generate mutations is by exchanging places with the bacterial Pol III replicase via a Pol III-Pol IV switch. Here, we describe multiple Pol III-Pol IV interactions and discuss evidence that these interactions are required for the Pol III-Pol IV switch. Furthermore, we describe several additional E. coli Pol-Pol interactions that may play fundamental roles in managing the actions of the different bacterial Pols in DNA replication, DNA repair, and TLS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA polymerase III; DNA polymerase IV; DNA replication; DinB; mutagenesis; polymerase switch; replicase; single-stranded DNA binding protein; sliding clamp; translation synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35285726      PMCID: PMC9017331          DOI: 10.1128/jb.00611-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.476


  53 in total

1.  Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A dynamic polymerase exchange with Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV replacing DNA polymerase III on the sliding clamp.

Authors:  Asako Furukohri; Myron F Goodman; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S R Kim; K Matsui; M Yamada; P Gruz; T Nohmi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 4.  Bacterial replicases and related polymerases.

Authors:  Charles S McHenry
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  DNA polymerase II as a fidelity factor in chromosomal DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Magdalena Banach-Orlowska; Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Courcelle; A Khodursky; B Peter; P O Brown; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Mutant βE202K Sliding Clamp Protein Impairs DNA Polymerase III Replication Activity.

Authors:  Caleb Homiski; Michelle K Scotland; Vignesh M P Babu; Sundari Chodavarapu; Robert W Maul; Jon M Kaguni; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Coordinating DNA polymerase traffic during high and low fidelity synthesis.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-06-21

9.  Error-Prone Translesion DNA Synthesis by Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase IV (DinB) on Templates Containing 1,2-dihydro-2-oxoadenine.

Authors:  Masaki Hori; Shin-Ichiro Yonekura; Takehiko Nohmi; Petr Gruz; Hiroshi Sugiyama; Shuji Yonei; Qiu-Mei Zhang-Akiyama
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-26

10.  Exchange between Escherichia coli polymerases II and III on a processivity clamp.

Authors:  James E Kath; Seungwoo Chang; Michelle K Scotland; Johannes H Wilbertz; Slobodan Jergic; Nicholas E Dixon; Mark D Sutton; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Direct visualization of translesion DNA synthesis polymerase IV at the replisome.

Authors:  Pham Minh Tuan; Neville S Gilhooly; Kenneth J Marians; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.