Literature DB >> 22538694

The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years.

John C Lipham1, Tom R DeMeester, Robert A Ganz, Luigi Bonavina, Greta Saino, Daniel H Dunn, Paul Fockens, Willem Bemelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sphincter augmentation with the LINX® Reflux Management System is a surgical option for patients with chronic gastroesophageal disease (GERD) and an inadequate response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Clinical experience with sphincter augmentation is now available out to 4 years.
METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study, 44 patients underwent a laparoscopic surgical procedure for placement of the LINX System around the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Each patient's baseline GERD status served as the control for evaluations post implant. Long-term efficacy measures included esophageal acid exposure, GERD quality-of-life measures, and use of PPIs. Adverse events and long-term complications were closely monitored.
RESULTS: For esophageal acid exposure, the mean total % time pH < 4 was reduced from 11.9 % at baseline to 3.8 % at 3 years (p < 0.001), with 80 % (18/20) of patients achieving pH normalization (≤ 5.3 %). At ≥ 4 years, 100 % (23/23) of the patients had improved quality-of-life measures for GERD, and 80 % (20/25) had complete cessation of the use of PPIs. There have been no reports of death or long-term device-related complications such as migration or erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter augmentation with the LINX Reflux Management System provided long-term clinical benefits with no safety issues, as demonstrated by reduced esophageal acid exposure, improved GERD-related quality of life, and cessation of dependence on PPIs, with minimal side effects and no safety issues. Patients with inadequate symptom control with acid suppression therapy may benefit from treatment with sphincter augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538694     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2289-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic sphincter augmentation device eliminates reflux symptoms and normalizes esophageal acid exposure: one- and 2-year results of a feasibility trial.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Tom DeMeester; Paul Fockens; Daniel Dunn; Greta Saino; Davide Bona; John Lipham; Willem Bemelman; Robert A Ganz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  James E Everhart; Constance E Ruhl
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Nissen fundoplication after failure of endoluminal fundoplication: short-term results.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Roberta Barbera; Alessandro Repici; Matteo Porta; Alberto Malesci; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP).

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; S Shay; M Vela; X Zhang; D Sifrim; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A new concept in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  S L Samelson; H F Weiser; C T Bombeck; J R Siewert; F E Ludtke; A H Hoelscher; S F Abuabara; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Systematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D Chen; C Barber; P McLoughlin; P Thavaneswaran; G G Jamieson; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  40 in total

1.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device.

Authors:  Margit Bauer; Alexander Meining; Michael Kranzfelder; Alissa Jell; Rebekka Schirren; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Esophageal Sphincter Device for Treatment of GERD.

Authors:  Robert A Ganz
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-10

4.  Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  John P Kuckelman; Cody J Phillips; Michael J Derickson; Byron J Faler; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.

Authors:  James M Tatum; Evan Alicuben; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kamran Samakar; Caitlin C Houghton; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Veronica Lazzari; Andrea Sironi; Matteo Porta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-18

7.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Regurgitation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hongke Zhang; Dinghui Dong; Zhengwen Liu; Shuixiang He; Liangshuo Hu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Review of antireflux procedures for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Hillman; R Yadlapati; M Whitsett; A J Thuluvath; M A Berendsen; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.