John P Kuckelman1, Cody J Phillips2, Michael J Derickson2, Byron J Faler3, Matthew J Martin2. 1. Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Avenue, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA. john.kuckelman@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Avenue, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with GERD after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Pre- and post-operative GERD quality of life (G-QOL) surveys were conducted. Standard indications (SI) group or the post-bariatric group (PB) created. Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients analyzed with no losses to follow-up. All patients had preoperative testing confirming normal motility and presence of GERD. No patients were lost to follow-up. The PB group (N = 10) were mostly prior sleeve gastrectomies (N = 8) with two previous gastric bypasses. PB patients required larger MSA device size (16 beads) compared to the SI group (14 beads, p < 0.001). Outcomes were no different with percent improvement between pre- and post-operative G-QOL survey scores with 70% improvement for PB and 84% for SI (p = 0.13). Medication cessation was possible in 90% for PB versus 94% for SI (p = 0.99). Rates of post-operative dysphagia were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger prospective randomized studies are needed, there is an exciting potential for the role of MSA, providing surgeons a new and much needed tool in their armamentarium against refractory or de novo GERD after bariatric procedures.
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with GERD after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Pre- and post-operative GERD quality of life (G-QOL) surveys were conducted. Standard indications (SI) group or the post-bariatric group (PB) created. Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients analyzed with no losses to follow-up. All patients had preoperative testing confirming normal motility and presence of GERD. No patients were lost to follow-up. The PB group (N = 10) were mostly prior sleeve gastrectomies (N = 8) with two previous gastric bypasses. PBpatients required larger MSA device size (16 beads) compared to the SI group (14 beads, p < 0.001). Outcomes were no different with percent improvement between pre- and post-operative G-QOL survey scores with 70% improvement for PB and 84% for SI (p = 0.13). Medication cessation was possible in 90% for PB versus 94% for SI (p = 0.99). Rates of post-operative dysphagia were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger prospective randomized studies are needed, there is an exciting potential for the role of MSA, providing surgeons a new and much needed tool in their armamentarium against refractory or de novo GERD after bariatric procedures.
Entities:
Keywords:
Indications; Magnetic sphincter augmentation; Revisional bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy
Authors: Wiebke V Petersen; Tobias Meile; Markus A Küper; Marty Zdichavsky; Alfred Königsrainer; Joachim H Schneider Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Radu Pescarus; Ahmed M Sharata; Christy M Dunst; Eran Shlomovitz; Lee L Swanström; Kevin M Reavis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 4.584