Literature DB >> 9834409

Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

V Velanovich1.   

Abstract

The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality-Of-Life (GERD-HRQL) scale was developed to objectively quantify symptom severity. It was compared to a "gold standard" health survey, the SF-36. Forty-three patients treated either medically or surgically for gastroesophageal reflux disease were asked to complete both the GERD-HRQL and the SF-36. They were asked the following: (1) Which questionnaire do you like best? (2) Which questionnaire was easier to understand? (3) Which questionnaire was more reflective of the problems you have with reflux disease? (4) Given the choice, which questionnaire would you rather fill out? Patients were asked to state their overall satisfaction with their present reflux symptom conditions. Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant predictor of patient satisfaction was the total GERD-HRQL score (P <0.00001). There were differences in the SF-36 domains of physical function (88.7 vs. 65.3; P = 0.004) and general health (68 vs. 46.5; P = 0.006). There were no correlations between the total GERD-HRQL scores and the SF-36 domain scores. Fifty-nine percent of patients preferred the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, 62% felt it was easier to understand, 86% felt it was more reflective of their symptoms, and 67% said they would rather use it over the SF-36. The GERD-HRQL better assesses symptom severity for gastroesophageal reflux disease than the generic SF-36

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9834409     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80004-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  17 in total

Review 1.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Measuring gastroesophageal reflux disease: relationship between the Health-Related Quality of Life score and physiologic parameters.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Karmy-Jones
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Outcome studies in surgical research.

Authors:  H J Kreder; J G Wright; R McLeod
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Health status, quality of life, and the individual.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Aug 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; S Ziebland; C Jenkinson; A Mowat; A Mowat
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

6.  Functioning and well-being of patients before and after elective surgical procedures.

Authors:  P C Temple; B Travis; L Sachs; S Strasser; P Choban; L Flancbaum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Methodological aspects of evaluation of Quality of Life in upper gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  E Dimenäs
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1993

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Quality of life and cost of therapy in reflux disease.

Authors:  H Glise
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1995
View more
  64 in total

1.  Measurement issues when assessing quality of life outcomes for different types of hernia mesh repair.

Authors:  Andras Zaborszky; Rita Gyanti; John A Barry; Brian K Saxby; Panchanan Bhattacharya; Fazal A Hasan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years.

Authors:  John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Robert A Ganz; Luigi Bonavina; Greta Saino; Daniel H Dunn; Paul Fockens; Willem Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-term experience of treating 185 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by anti-reflux surgery respecting the functional-morphological restoration of the esophagus.

Authors:  R Horstmann; C Classen; S Röttgermann; M Langer; D Palmes
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Assessment of quality of life after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Deniz Balci; Ahmet G Turkcapar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with sentinel node mapping for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Takashi Oyama; Satoshi Kamiya; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Norihito Wada; Yoshiro Saikawa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales.

Authors:  V Pratap Mouli; Vineet Ahuja
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-23

7.  Patient-Centered Outcome Instruments in Esophageal and Gastric Surgery.

Authors:  Livingstone Dore; Blake Fernandez; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Measuring Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery: Quality of Life Versus Symptom Scores?

Authors:  Jan H Koetje; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Tanya Irvine; George C Mayne; David I Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Steven A Groene; Tanu Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Measurement invariance of the kidney disease and quality of life instrument (KDQOL-SF) across veterans and non-veterans.

Authors:  Karen L Saban; Fred B Bryant; Domenic J Reda; Kevin T Stroupe; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.