Literature DB >> 30022361

Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Emanuele Asti1, Alberto Aiolfi1, Veronica Lazzari1, Andrea Sironi1, Matteo Porta1, Luigi Bonavina2,3.   

Abstract

Use of the magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device for the laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasing since the first clinical implant performed a decade ago. The MSA procedure is a minimally invasive and highly standardized surgical option for patients who are partially responders to proton-pump inhibitors, which have troublesome regurgitation or develop progressive symptoms despite continuous medical therapy. The procedure has proven to be highly effective in improving typical reflux symptoms, reducing the use of proton-pump inhibitors, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure. Observational cohort studies have shown that MSA compares well with fundoplication in selected patients and has an acceptable safety profile. The device can be easily removed if necessary, thereby preserving the option of fundoplication in the future. The majority of the removals have occurred within 2 years after implant and have been managed non-emergently, with no complications or long-term consequences. "Expanded" indications to MSA (large hiatal hernia and Barrett's esophagus) need to be tested in further comparative studies with classic fundoplication procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundoplication; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Hiatus hernia; Linx; Lower esophageal sphincter; Magnetic sphincter augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30022361     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0569-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: key to success in the community setting.

Authors:  Joel E Richter; Daniel T Dempsey
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.

Authors:  Jessica L Reynolds; Joerg Zehetner; Phil Wu; Shawn Shah; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Introduction of mechanical sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease into practice: early clinical outcomes and keys to successful adoption.

Authors:  C Daniel Smith; Kenneth R DeVault; Mauricia Buchanan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: The Safety of a Modern Implant.

Authors:  C Daniel Smith; Robert A Ganz; John C Lipham; Reginald C Bell; David W Rattner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Dale Shultz; Christina Brennan; Eric Vallières; Ralph W Aye
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Utilisation of surgical fundoplication for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the USA has declined rapidly between 2009 and 2013.

Authors:  F Khan; C Maradey-Romero; S Ganocy; R Frazier; R Fass
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Jessica L Reynolds; John C Lipham; Joerg Zehetner; Nikolai A Bildzukewicz; Paul A Taiganides; Jody Mickley; Ralph W Aye; Alexander S Farivar; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.

Authors:  Jessica L Reynolds; Joerg Zehetner; Angela Nieh; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kulmeet Sandhu; Namir Katkhouda; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.

Authors:  Kais A Rona; James M Tatum; Joerg Zehetner; Katrin Schwameis; Carol Chow; Kamran Samakar; Adrian Dobrowolsky; Caitlin C Houghton; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with hiatal hernia: clinical outcome and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Nobel Chowdhury; Ali H Zaidi; Kristy Chovanec; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Ashten N Omstead; Ping Zheng; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Ping Zheng; Ali H Zaidi; Kristy Chovanec; Nobel Chowdhury; Madison Salvitti; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Ashten N Omstead; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Davide Ferrari; Emanuele Asti; Veronica Lazzari; Stefano Siboni; Daniele Bernardi; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.