Literature DB >> 22533576

Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis.

Kyuseok Kim1, Young Hoon Kim, So Yeon Kim, Suyoung Kim, Yoon Jin Lee, Kwang Pyo Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Soyeon Ahn, Taeyun Kim, Seung-sik Hwang, Ki Jun Song, Sung-Bum Kang, Duck-Woo Kim, Seong Ho Park, Kyoung Ho Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has become the predominant test for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. In children and young adults, exposure to CT radiation is of particular concern. We evaluated the rate of negative (unnecessary) appendectomy after low-dose versus standard-dose abdominal CT in young adults with suspected appendicitis.
METHODS: In this single-institution, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 891 patients with suspected appendicitis to either low-dose CT (444 patients) or standard-dose CT (447 patients). The median radiation dose in terms of dose-length product was 116 mGy·cm in the low-dose group and 521 mGy·cm in the standard-dose group. The primary end point was the percentage of negative appendectomies among all nonincidental appendectomies, with a noninferiority margin of 5.5 percentage points. Secondary end points included the appendiceal perforation rate and the proportion of patients with suspected appendicitis who required additional imaging.
RESULTS: The negative appendectomy rate was 3.5% (6 of 172 patients) in the low-dose CT group and 3.2% (6 of 186 patients) in the standard-dose CT group (difference, 0.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.8 to 4.6). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of the appendiceal perforation rate (26.5% with low-dose CT and 23.3% with standard-dose CT, P=0.46) or the proportion of patients who needed additional imaging tests (3.2% and 1.6%, respectively; P=0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT was noninferior to standard-dose CT with respect to negative appendectomy rates in young adults with suspected appendicitis. (Funded by GE Healthcare Medical Diagnostics and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00913380.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533576     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  75 in total

1.  Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Manoj K Mittal; Peter S Dayan; Charles G Macias; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan Bennett; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Kelly Sinclair; Michelle D Stevenson; Anupam B Kharbanda
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Imaging for appendicitis: should radiation-induced cancer risks affect modality selection?

Authors:  Sorapop Kiatpongsan; Lesley Meng; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Maurice Herring; Laura L Avery; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Emergency assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain using low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Minerva Becker; Christoph D Becker; Alice Halfon Poletti; Olivier T Rutschmann; Habib Zaidi; Thomas Perneger; Alexandra Platon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.

Authors:  Juliane Liese; Thomas M Halbinger; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Christoph W Strey
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Should Oral Contrast Be Omitted in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis?

Authors:  Lily Saadat; Irene Helenowski; David Mahvi; Anne-Marie Boller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  CT following US for possible appendicitis: anatomic coverage.

Authors:  Martin E O'Malley; Fawaz Alharbi; Tanya P Chawla; Hadas Moshonov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Abdominal-pelvic scanning parameters revisited: a case for Z-axis reduction in patients with clinical suspicion for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Darshan C Patel; Yu-Hui Huang; Jonathan Meyer; Amir Sepahdari
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27

9.  Can We Perform CT of the Appendix with Less Than 1 mSv? A De-escalating Dose-simulation Study.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Jong-June Jeon; Sung Soo Lee; Amar C Dhanantwari; Ji Ye Sim; Hae Young Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jenneke T H Hamminga; H Sijbrand Hofker; Paul M A Broens; Philip M Kluin; Erik Heineman; Jan Willem Haveman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.