Darshan C Patel1, Yu-Hui Huang2, Jonathan Meyer1,3, Amir Sepahdari1,3. 1. Department of Radiology (M/C 931), University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street, Room 2483, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. 2. University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if CT for appendicitis can be abbreviated to begin at the top of the L2 vertebral body level and still maintain the detection rate of appendicitis and other symptomatic pathology without omitting significant incidental findings. METHODS: Retrospective review of CT abdomen-pelvis exams for suspected appendicitis over a 5-month period was performed. The Z-axis scan length of the original full scans and theoretical limited scans from the top of L2 were recorded and calculated. Images were reviewed for incidental findings above the L2 vertebral body level and categorized by severity per American College of Radiology (ACR) white paper guidelines. Final diagnoses based on imaging findings were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients (46 males, 73 females, mean age 29 ± 14) were included. Appendicitis was present in 26 cases (22%). Using a theoretical scan beginning at the top of the L2 vertebral body, none of the findings leading to diagnosis of appendicitis would have been missed. A total of 30 incidental findings were found above the L2 vertebral body. Per ACR white paper guidelines, 26 of these findings did not require additional imaging follow-up. Additional follow-up imaging was recommended for 3 of the findings above L2, and 1 right adrenal metastasis was found above L2 in a patient with previously undiagnosed NSCLC. This patient coincidentally also had appendicitis. No symptomatic pathology would have been missed had the scans begun at the top of the L2 vertebral body. Such an abbreviated scan would have resulted in a mean Z-axis reduction of 12.9 cm (30.3%). CONCLUSIONS: CT using abbreviated Z-axis scan length can reduce radiation dose and provide necessary imaging needed to diagnose appendicitis or other symptomatic pathology without omitting significant incidental findings.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if CT for appendicitis can be abbreviated to begin at the top of the L2 vertebral body level and still maintain the detection rate of appendicitis and other symptomatic pathology without omitting significant incidental findings. METHODS: Retrospective review of CT abdomen-pelvis exams for suspected appendicitis over a 5-month period was performed. The Z-axis scan length of the original full scans and theoretical limited scans from the top of L2 were recorded and calculated. Images were reviewed for incidental findings above the L2 vertebral body level and categorized by severity per American College of Radiology (ACR) white paper guidelines. Final diagnoses based on imaging findings were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients (46 males, 73 females, mean age 29 ± 14) were included. Appendicitis was present in 26 cases (22%). Using a theoretical scan beginning at the top of the L2 vertebral body, none of the findings leading to diagnosis of appendicitis would have been missed. A total of 30 incidental findings were found above the L2 vertebral body. Per ACR white paper guidelines, 26 of these findings did not require additional imaging follow-up. Additional follow-up imaging was recommended for 3 of the findings above L2, and 1 right adrenal metastasis was found above L2 in a patient with previously undiagnosed NSCLC. This patient coincidentally also had appendicitis. No symptomatic pathology would have been missed had the scans begun at the top of the L2 vertebral body. Such an abbreviated scan would have resulted in a mean Z-axis reduction of 12.9 cm (30.3%). CONCLUSIONS: CT using abbreviated Z-axis scan length can reduce radiation dose and provide necessary imaging needed to diagnose appendicitis or other symptomatic pathology without omitting significant incidental findings.
Authors: Claudia D Furtado; Diego A Aguirre; Claude B Sirlin; David Dang; Stephan K Stamato; Patrick Lee; Farhad Sani; Michelle A Brown; David L Levin; Giovanna Casola Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Kim; J E Rhee; C C Lee; K S Kim; J H Shin; M J Kwak; J H Kim; G J Suh; S K Hahn; A J Singer Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Kuojen Tsao; Shawn D St Peter; Patricia A Valusek; Troy L Spilde; Scott J Keckler; Abhilash Nair; Daniel J Ostlie; George W Holcomb Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Dominik Zinsser; Michael Maurer; Phuong-Linh Do; Jakob Weiß; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Fabian Bamberg; Ahmed E Othman Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 1.930