Martin E O'Malley1, Fawaz Alharbi2,3, Tanya P Chawla4, Hadas Moshonov5. 1. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 3-920, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2 M9, Canada. martin.o'malley@uhn.ca. 2. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, NCSB 1C572, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2 N2, Canada. drfawazalharbi@gmail.com. 3. Department of Medical Imaging, Qassim University, Buraydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia. drfawazalharbi@gmail.com. 4. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 567, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada. tchawla@mtsinai.on.ca. 5. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, OPG Building, 2nd Floor, North Side, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6, Canada. hadas.moshonov@uhn.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine superior-inferior anatomic borders for CT following inconclusive/nondiagnostic US for possible appendicitis. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with possible appendicitis and inconclusive/nondiagnostic US followed by CT were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists reviewed CT images and determined superior-inferior anatomic borders required to diagnose or exclude appendicitis and diagnose alternative causes. This "targeted" coverage was used to estimate potential reduction in anatomic coverage compared to standard abdominal/pelvic CT. RESULTS: The study group included 83 women and 16 men; mean age 32 (median, 29; range 18-73) years. Final diagnoses were: nonspecific abdominal pain 50/99 (51%), appendicitis 26/99 (26%), gynaecological 12/99 (12%), gastrointestinal 9/99 (10%), and musculoskeletal 2/99 (2%). Median dose-length product for standard CT was 890.0 (range, 306.3 - 2493.9) mGy.cm. To confidently diagnose/exclude appendicitis or identify alternative diagnoses, maximum superior-inferior anatomic CT coverage was the superior border of L2-superior border of pubic symphysis, for both reviewers. Targeted CT would reduce anatomic coverage by 30-55% (mean 39%, median 40%) compared to standard CT. CONCLUSIONS: When CT is performed for appendicitis following inconclusive/nondiagnostic US, targeted CT from the superior border of L2-superior border of pubic symphysis can be used resulting in significant reduction in exposure to ionizing radiation compared to standard CT. KEY POINTS: • When CT is used following inconclusive/ nondiagnostic ultrasound, anatomic coverage can be reduced. • CT from L2 to pubic symphysis can be used to diagnose/exclude appendicitis. • Reduced anatomic coverage for CT results in reduced exposure to ionizing radiation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine superior-inferior anatomic borders for CT following inconclusive/nondiagnostic US for possible appendicitis. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with possible appendicitis and inconclusive/nondiagnostic US followed by CT were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists reviewed CT images and determined superior-inferior anatomic borders required to diagnose or exclude appendicitis and diagnose alternative causes. This "targeted" coverage was used to estimate potential reduction in anatomic coverage compared to standard abdominal/pelvic CT. RESULTS: The study group included 83 women and 16 men; mean age 32 (median, 29; range 18-73) years. Final diagnoses were: nonspecific abdominal pain 50/99 (51%), appendicitis 26/99 (26%), gynaecological 12/99 (12%), gastrointestinal 9/99 (10%), and musculoskeletal 2/99 (2%). Median dose-length product for standard CT was 890.0 (range, 306.3 - 2493.9) mGy.cm. To confidently diagnose/exclude appendicitis or identify alternative diagnoses, maximum superior-inferior anatomic CT coverage was the superior border of L2-superior border of pubic symphysis, for both reviewers. Targeted CT would reduce anatomic coverage by 30-55% (mean 39%, median 40%) compared to standard CT. CONCLUSIONS: When CT is performed for appendicitis following inconclusive/nondiagnostic US, targeted CT from the superior border of L2-superior border of pubic symphysis can be used resulting in significant reduction in exposure to ionizing radiation compared to standard CT. KEY POINTS: • When CT is used following inconclusive/ nondiagnostic ultrasound, anatomic coverage can be reduced. • CT from L2 to pubic symphysis can be used to diagnose/exclude appendicitis. • Reduced anatomic coverage for CT results in reduced exposure to ionizing radiation.
Authors: Yoshiko Sagara; Amy K Hara; William Pavlicek; Alvin C Silva; Robert G Paden; Qing Wu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J E Jacobs; B A Birnbaum; M Macari; A J Megibow; G Israel; D D Maki; A M Aguiar; C P Langlotz Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrea S Doria; Rahim Moineddin; Christian J Kellenberger; Monica Epelman; Joseph Beyene; Suzanne Schuh; Paul S Babyn; Paul T Dick Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-08-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Pieter Poortman; Henk J M Oostvogel; Eelke Bosma; Paul N M Lohle; Miguel A Cuesta; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Jaap F Hamming Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Fraukje Wiersma; Rutger F R Bakker; Jos W S Merkus; Paul J Breslau; Jaap F Hamming Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Nattinee Leelakanok; Andrew S Phelps; Matthew A Zapala; Kambrie Kato; Michael Ohliger; Yi Li; Jesse Courtier Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: Dominik Zinsser; Michael Maurer; Phuong-Linh Do; Jakob Weiß; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Fabian Bamberg; Ahmed E Othman Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 1.930