Literature DB >> 33085465

Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Kimberley M Zorn1, Daniel H Foil1, Thomas R Lane1, Wendy Hillwalker2, David J Feifarek2, Frank Jones2, William D Klaren2, Ashley M Brinkman2, Sean Ekins1.   

Abstract

The androgen receptor (AR) is a target of interest for endocrine disruption research, as altered signaling can affect normal reproductive and neurological development for generations. In an effort to prioritize compounds with alternative methodologies, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used in vitro data from 11 assays to construct models of AR agonist and antagonist signaling pathways. While these EPA ToxCast AR models require in vitro data to assign a bioactivity score, Bayesian machine learning methods can be used for prospective prediction from molecule structure alone. This approach was applied to multiple types of data corresponding to the EPA's AR signaling pathway with proprietary software, Assay Central. The training performance of all machine learning models, including six other algorithms, was evaluated by internal 5-fold cross-validation statistics. Bayesian machine learning models were also evaluated with external predictions of reference chemicals to compare prediction accuracies to published results from the EPA. The machine learning model group selected for further studies of endocrine disruption consisted of continuous AC50 data from the February 2019 release of ToxCast/Tox21. These efforts demonstrate how machine learning can be used to predict AR-mediated bioactivity and can also be applied to other targets of endocrine disruption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; androgen receptor; endocrine disruption; machine learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33085465      PMCID: PMC8243727          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  40 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian methods in virtual screening and chemical biology.

Authors:  Andreas Bender
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

2.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Ann M Richard; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert J Kavlock
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Development of a curated Hershberger database.

Authors:  P Browne; N C Kleinstreuer; P Ceger; C Deisenroth; N Baker; K Markey; R S Thomas; R J Judson; W Casey
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI).

Authors:  Eni Minerali; Daniel H Foil; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Development, validation and integration of in silico models to identify androgen active chemicals.

Authors:  Serena Manganelli; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Kamel Mansouri; Richard S Judson; Emilio Benfenati; Alberto Manganaro; Patricia Ruiz
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Toxicity prediction of small drug molecules of androgen receptor using multilevel ensemble model.

Authors:  Vishan Kumar Gupta; Prashant Singh Rana
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 1.122

7.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Machine Learning Consensus To Predict the Binding to the Androgen Receptor within the CoMPARA Project.

Authors:  Francesca Grisoni; Viviana Consonni; Davide Ballabio
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Open Source Bayesian Models. 1. Application to ADME/Tox and Drug Discovery Datasets.

Authors:  Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Anna Coulon-Spektor; Andrew McNutt; George Grass; Joel S Freundlich; Robert C Reynolds; Sean Ekins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Development and Validation of a Computational Model for Androgen Receptor Activity.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Patricia Ceger; Eric D Watt; Matthew Martin; Keith Houck; Patience Browne; Russell S Thomas; Warren M Casey; David J Dix; David Allen; Srilatha Sakamuru; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Richard Judson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.739

View more
  6 in total

1.  Direct Prediction of Physicochemical Properties and Toxicities of Chemicals from Analytical Descriptors by GC-MS.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Zushi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 8.008

2.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Thomas R Lane; Daniel H Foil; Eni Minerali; Fabio Urbina; Kimberley M Zorn; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Androgen Receptor Binding Category Prediction with Deep Neural Networks and Structure-, Ligand-, and Statistically Based Features.

Authors:  Alfonso T García-Sosa
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Research Progress of the Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Disinfection Byproducts.

Authors:  Shuxin Sui; Huihui Liu; Xianhai Yang
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 6.  Review of in silico studies dedicated to the nuclear receptor family: Therapeutic prospects and toxicological concerns.

Authors:  Asma Sellami; Manon Réau; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.055

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.