Literature DB >> 22527545

Beyond the complications: medium-term anatomical, sexual and functional outcomes following removal of trocar-guided transvaginal mesh. A retrospective cohort study.

Stephen T Jeffery1, Andri Nieuwoudt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to assess the anatomical, sexual and functional outcomes of women undergoing surgical intervention for complications of the trocar-guided transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedure.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a clinical database of women who had developed a complication following a TVM procedure. This included dyspareunia, mesh erosion, urinary symptoms, mesh contraction and prolapse recurrence. Pre- and post-operatively, we assessed the women for prolapse, stress incontinence, urgency, defecatory difficulty, digitation, pain, dyspareunia and apareunia. We also recorded the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) score. The TVM was removed and a Biodesign graft was used in the majority of cases to prevent further prolapse. Follow-up was at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years.
RESULTS: In our cohort of 21 women, 18 required surgery for pain and/or dyspareunia; 20 women had reached the 6-week follow-up at the time of analysis. At 6 weeks, two women still had pain and required a second intervention. Fifteen women had reached a 6-month follow-up and only one woman had persistent pain requiring repeat surgery. Of the 15 women, 7 were sexually active and in 6 cases the dyspareunia had resolved completely with 1 woman retaining an element of pain at intercourse. Six women had been seen at 12 months and all four of the sexually active women had no dyspareunia. There were no symptoms relating to prolapse in any of the women at 6 weeks, 6, 12 or 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS: We report satisfactory outcomes following removal of a complicated TVM kit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527545     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1746-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  17 in total

1.  Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Feldner; Rodrigo Aquino Castro; Luiz Antonio Cipolotti; Carlos Antonio Delroy; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The use of synthetic meshes in vaginal prolapse surgery.

Authors:  D G Tincello
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Tapio Väyrynen; Marie Ellström Engh; Susanne Axelsen; Christian Falconer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

4.  Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management.

Authors:  Benjamin Feiner; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Risk factors for mesh erosion 3 months following vaginal reconstructive surgery using commercial kits vs. fashioned mesh-augmented vaginal repairs.

Authors:  Peter S Finamore; Karolynn T Echols; Krystal Hunter; Howard B Goldstein; Adam S Holzberg; Babak Vakili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The great mesh debate.

Authors:  Robert M Freeman; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-10

Review 8.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

9.  Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Thomas L Wheeler; Joeseph Schaffer; Zhen Chen; Cathie Spino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Discrepancies between physician interview and a patient self-assessment questionnaire after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  T A de Boer; D A Gietelink; M E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Clinical analysis of pain after transvaginal mesh surgery in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Chang Shi; Ying Zhao; Qing Hu; Runqi Gong; Yitong Yin; Zhijun Xia
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.