Literature DB >> 20093906

Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management.

Benjamin Feiner1, Christopher Maher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While transvaginal polypropylene mesh is increasingly used in the management of pelvic organ prolapse, contraction of the mesh after implantation may cause substantial morbidity. This report defines the clinical entity of vaginal mesh contraction.
METHODS: This is a case series of women who underwent surgical intervention for the management of symptomatic vaginal mesh contraction in our tertiary referral urogynecology center between January 2007 and December 2008. We evaluated the presenting symptoms, examination findings, subsequent management, and outcome.
RESULTS: Seventeen women with vaginal mesh contraction were included in this series. Clinical presentation included severe vaginal pain, aggravated by movement (17 of 17), dyspareunia in all sexually active women (14 of 14), and focal tenderness over contracted portions of the mesh on vaginal examination (17 of 17), commonly involving the lateral fixation arms. Mesh erosion (9 of 17), vaginal tightness (7 of 17), and shortening (5 of 17) were frequently present. Surgical intervention consisted of mobilization of the mesh from the underlying tissue, division of fixation arms from the central graft, and excision of contracted mesh. After surgery, 88% (15 of 17; 95% confidence interval 73-104) of women have experienced substantial reduction in vaginal pain and 64% (9 of 14; 95% confidence interval 39-89) experienced substantial reduction in dyspareunia. Three women required subsequent excision of the entire accessible mesh because of persisting symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal mesh contraction is a serious complication after prolapse repair with armed polypropylene mesh that is associated with substantial morbidity, frequently requiring surgical intervention. Research and development is urgently needed for newer graft materials with diminished shrinkage properties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20093906     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cbca4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  43 in total

1.  Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation--evidence of mesh contraction or folding?

Authors:  Kamil Svabík; Alois Martan; Jaromir Masata; Rachid El-Haddad; Petr Hubka; Marketa Pavlikova
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Self-retaining support implant: an anchorless system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gil Levy; Anna Padoa; Zoltan Fekete; George Bartfai; Laszlo Pajor; Mauro Cervigni
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Impact of rectopexy on sexual function: a cohort analysis.

Authors:  H A Formijne Jonkers; N Poierrié; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Pearls and pitfalls of mesh surgery.

Authors:  Ajay Rane; Jay Iyer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-01-05

7.  Diagnosis and Therapy of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/006, April 2016).

Authors:  K Baeßler; T Aigmüller; S Albrich; C Anthuber; D Finas; T Fink; C Fünfgeld; B Gabriel; U Henscher; F H Hetzer; M Hübner; B Junginger; K Jundt; S Kropshofer; A Kuhn; L Logé; G Nauman; U Peschers; T Pfiffer; O Schwandner; A Strauss; R Tunn; V Viereck
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Biologic grafts for cystocele repair: does concomitant midline fascial plication improve surgical outcomes?

Authors:  Deborah R Karp; Thais V Peterson; Ayman Mahdy; Gamal Ghoniem; Vivian C Aguilar; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Managing chronic pelvic pain following reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh.

Authors:  Anthony N Gyang; Jessica B Feranec; Rakesh C Patel; Georgine M Lamvu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.