Literature DB >> 19936589

Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations.

Naama Marcus-Braun1, Peter von Theobald.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of the study was to reveal the way we treat vaginal mesh complications in a trained referral center.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical removal of transvaginal mesh for mesh-related complications during a 5-year period.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent 104 operations including 61 complete mesh removal, 14 partial excision, 15 section of sub-urethral sling, and five laparoscopies. Main indications were erosion, infection, granuloma, incomplete voiding, and pain. Fifty-eight removals occurred more than 2 years after the primary mesh placement. Mean operation time was 21 min, and there were two intraoperative and ten minor postoperative complications. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recurred in 38% and cystocele in 19% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In a trained center, mesh removal was found to be a quick and safe procedure. Mesh-related complications may frequently occur more than 2 years after the primary operation. Recurrence was mostly associated with SUI and less with genital prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19936589     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1050-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

1.  Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Loïc Boulanger; Malik Boukerrou; Chrystèle Rubod; Pierre Collinet; A Fruchard; René J Courcol; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

2.  Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits.

Authors:  Beri Ridgeway; Mark D Walters; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Sarah E McAchran; Howard B Goldman; J Eric Jelovsek
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Complications of vaginal mesh: our experience.

Authors:  Bernard Jacquetin; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-10

4.  The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall.

Authors:  T M Julian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cystocele repair by transobturator four arms mesh: monocentric experience of first 123 patients.

Authors:  Cyril Eboue; Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse.

Authors:  Rebecca U Margulies; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Dee E Fenner; Edward J McGuire; J Quentin Clemens; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients.

Authors:  Fréderic Caquant; Pierre Collinet; Philippe Debodinance; Juan Berrocal; Olivier Garbin; Claude Rosenthal; Henri Clave; Richard Villet; Bernard Jacquetin; Michel Cosson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Transobturator versus transabdominal mid urethral slings: a multi-institutional comparison of obstructive voiding complications.

Authors:  Allen F Morey; Andrew R Medendorp; Mark W Noller; Rafael V Mora; Kevin C Shandera; John P Foley; Luis R Rivera; Juan A Reyna; Patricia J Terry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John N Nguyen; Raoul J Burchette
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)--a case series multicentric study.

Authors:  B Fatton; J Amblard; P Debodinance; M Cosson; B Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-28
View more
  22 in total

1.  The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  John R Miklos; Orawee Chinthakanan; Robert D Moore; Gretchen K Mitchell; Sheena Favors; Deborah R Karp; Gina M Northington; Gladys M Nogueiras; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Bladder polyps following Avaulta anterior mesh vaginal wall repair.

Authors:  M Auzin; T M Teune; C J A Hogewoning
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Update in management of vaginal mesh erosion.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Laurence Peyrat; François Haab
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Cystocele repair with single-incision, trocarless mesh system.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse.

Authors:  Alexis A Dieter; Marcella G Willis-Gray; Alison C Weidner; Anthony G Visco; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Basic science and clinical aspects of mesh infection in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Vincent Letouzey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sophie Warembourg; Majd Labaki; Renaud de Tayrac; Pierre Costa; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Computer modeling informs study design: vaginal estrogen to prevent mesh erosion after different routes of prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Alison C Weidner; Jennifer M Wu; Amie Kawasaki; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Authors:  Ozan Dogan; Aski Ellibes Kaya; Cigdem Pulatoglu; Alper Basbug; Murat Yassa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.