Literature DB >> 22501079

The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

Riya Singh1, Jont B Allen.   

Abstract

Studies on consonant perception under noise conditions typically describe the average consonant error as exponential in the Articulation Index (AI). While this AI formula nicely fits the average error over all consonants, it does not fit the error for any consonant at the utterance level. This study analyzes the error patterns of six stop consonants /p, t, k, b, d, g/ with four vowels (/α/, /ε/, /I/, /ae/), at the individual consonant (i.e., utterance) level. The findings include that the utterance error is essentially zero for signal to noise ratios (SNRs) at least -2 dB, for >78% of the stop consonant utterances. For these utterances, the error is essentially a step function in the SNR at the utterance's detection threshold. This binary error dependence is consistent with the audibility of a single binary defining acoustic feature, having zero error above the feature's detection threshold. Also 11% of the sounds have high error, defined as ≥ 20% for SNRs greater than or equal to -2 dB. A grand average across many such sounds, having a natural distribution in thresholds, results in the error being exponential in the AI measure, as observed. A detailed analysis of the variance from the AI error is provided along with a Bernoulli-trials analysis of the statistical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22501079      PMCID: PMC3339505          DOI: 10.1121/1.3682054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Letter: Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector?

Authors:  L Lisker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Integration across frequency bands for consonant identification.

Authors:  Diane Ronan; Ann K Dix; Phalguni Shah; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual effects of plosive feature modification.

Authors:  Abhinauv Kapoor; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant recognition and the articulation index.

Authors:  Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the perception of voicing in syllable-initial plosives in noise.

Authors:  Jintao Jiang; Marcia Chen; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A method of calculating hearing loss for speech from an audiogram.

Authors:  H FLETCHER
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1950

Review 8.  Toward a theory of speech perception.

Authors:  R A Cole; B Scott
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  5 in total

1.  A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Andrea Trevino; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.

Authors:  Ali Abavisani; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.