Literature DB >> 22280609

Perceptual effects of plosive feature modification.

Abhinauv Kapoor1, Jont B Allen.   

Abstract

In the 1970-1980's, a number of papers explored the role of the transitional and burst features in consonant-vowel context. These papers left unresolved the relative importance of these two acoustic cues. This research takes advantage of refined signal processing methods, allowing for the visualization and modification of acoustic details. This experiment explores the impact of modifying the strength of the acoustic burst feature on the recognition scores P(c)(SNR) (function of the signal-to-noise ratio), for four plosive sounds /ta, ka, da, ga/. These results show high correlations between the relative burst intensity and the scores P(c)(SNR). Based on this correlation, one must conclude that these bursts are the primary acoustic cues used for the identification of these four consonants. This is in contrast to previous experiments, which used less precise methods to manipulate speech, and observe complex relationships between the scores, bursts and transition cues. In cases where the burst feature is removed entirely, it is shown that naturally existing conflicting acoustic features dominate the score. These observations seem directly inconsistent with transition cues playing a role: if the transition cues were important, they would dominate over low-level conflicting burst cues. These limited results arguably rule out the concept of redundant cues.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22280609      PMCID: PMC3283903          DOI: 10.1121/1.3665991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  A psychoacoustic method to find the perceptual cues of stop consonants in natural speech.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech cue enhancement in intervocalic stops.

Authors:  W F Sendlmeier
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Consonant recognition and the articulation index.

Authors:  Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant confusions in white noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Andrew Lovitt; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Toward a theory of speech perception.

Authors:  R A Cole; B Scott
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; D B Pisoni; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

Authors:  Riya Singh; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Andrea Trevino; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory "bubbles": Efficient classification of the spectrotemporal modulations essential for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.

Authors:  Ali Abavisani; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Enhancement of Consonant Recognition in Bimodal and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Britteny Riley; Henna Patel; Amanda Frost; Paul Fillmore; Rene Gifford; John Hansen
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Substitution Patterns of Phoneme Errors in Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Woojae Han; Hyungi Chun; Gibbeum Kim; In-Ki Jin
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-03-30

8.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Ben Williges; Wiebke Lamping; Lorenzo Picinali; Deborah Vickers
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.