Literature DB >> 15478442

Integration across frequency bands for consonant identification.

Diane Ronan1, Ann K Dix, Phalguni Shah, Louis D Braida.   

Abstract

A comparison of the predictions of models of integration to data on the reception of consonants filtered into a variety of frequency bands is reported. New data on the consonant identification are presented. Three experiments were conducted testing the following bands: experiment I, 0-2100 Hz and 2100-4500 Hz; experiment II, 0-700 Hz combined with 700-1400, 1400-2100, 2100-2800, and 2800-4500 Hz; experiment III, all combinations of 700-1400, 1400-2100, 2100-2800, and 2800-4500 Hz. The predictions of four models, Fletcher's [Speech and Hearing in Communication (Van Nostrand, New York, 1950)] independent errors model, Massaro's fuzzy logical model of perception [Proc. Int. Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Vol. 3, pp. 106-113 (1987)], and Braida's pre-labelling and post-labelling models of integration [Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 43, 647-677 (1991)], were compared in terms of their ability to predict combined-band scores. At least two models were capable of predicting performance for each combined-band condition. For experiment I, all models were able to make satisfactory predictions. For experiment II, a variant of the pre-labelling model was able to make satisfactory predictions. For experiment III, no model was able to make satisfactory predictions, but the fuzzy logical model of perception and a variant of the pre-labelling model made relatively good predictions. Thus the ability of the models to predict performance depended more on whether the condition included the lowest frequency band than on the adjacency or frequency separation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478442     DOI: 10.1121/1.1777858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

Authors:  Riya Singh; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intra- versus intermodal integration in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brent P Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing models of the combined-stimulation advantage for speech recognition.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Ted A Meyer; Adam R Kaiser; Su Wooi Teoh; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Gail Donaldson; Ala Somarowthu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A model-based analysis of the "combined-stimulation advantage".

Authors:  Fabien Seldran; Christophe Micheyl; Eric Truy; Christian Berger-Vachon; Hung Thai-Van; Stéphane Gallego
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Aging and Spectro-Temporal Integration of Speech.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Effects of the intensified frequency and time ranges on consonant enhancement in bilateral cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Carrie Drew
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.