Literature DB >> 22501071

Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Mickael L D Deroche1, Danielle J Zion, Jaclyn R Schurman, Monita Chatterjee.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the ability of 17 school-aged children to process purely temporal and spectro-temporal cues that signal changes in pitch. Percentage correct was measured for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise in experiment 1 and for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband sine-phase harmonic complexes in experiment 2. The reference AMR was 100 Hz as was the reference F0. A child-friendly interface helped listeners to remain attentive to the task. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique that extracted threshold, slope, and lapse rate. All thresholds were subsequently standardized to a common d' value equal to 0.77. There were relatively large individual differences across listeners: eight had relatively adult-like thresholds in both tasks and nine had higher thresholds. However, these individual differences did not vary systematically with age, over the span of 6-16 yr. Thresholds were correlated across the two tasks and were about nine times finer for F0 discrimination than for AMR discrimination as has been previously observed in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22501071      PMCID: PMC3339501          DOI: 10.1121/1.3692230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  The assessment of pitch discrimination ability in young children.

Authors:  M L Andrews; S S Madeira
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1977-05

2.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude-modulated noise: the detection of modulation versus the detection of modulation rate.

Authors:  R D Patterson; D Johnson-Davies; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; P K Robinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory cortex and the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  I C Whitfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Development of psychoacoustic behavior: sensitivity and discrimination.

Authors:  A B Maxon; I Hochberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Cortical lesions and auditory discrimination.

Authors:  D N Elliott; C Trahiotis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The perceptual reality of tone chroma in early infancy.

Authors:  L Demany; F Armand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Infant pitch perception: evidence for responding to pitch categories and the missing fundamental.

Authors:  M G Clarkson; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Development of frequency discrimination at 250 Hz is similar for tone and /ba/ stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Mary M Flaherty; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Sandy Oba; Deniz Başkent; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Danielle J Zion; Mickael L Deroche; Brooke A Burianek; Charles J Limb; Alison P Goren; Aditya M Kulkarni; Julie A Christensen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Yi-Ping Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Ronald Y Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The Influence of the Psychophysical Assessment Paradigm on Pitch Discrimination for Adults (and a Pilot Sample of Children).

Authors:  Ashley G Flagge; Lucile Puranen; Madhuri S Mulekar
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2021-09-02

8.  Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Jenna Browning; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Sandra I Oba; Deniz Başkent; Monita Chatterjee; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Hui-Ping Lu; Charles J Limb; Yung-Song Lin; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.