Literature DB >> 34474624

The Influence of the Psychophysical Assessment Paradigm on Pitch Discrimination for Adults (and a Pilot Sample of Children).

Ashley G Flagge1, Lucile Puranen1, Madhuri S Mulekar2.   

Abstract

Pitch discrimination ability has been of research interest due to its potential relationship to language and literacy. However, assessment protocols for pitch discrimination have varied widely. Prior studies with both children and adults have produced conflicting performance findings across different pitch discrimination research paradigms, though they have consistently shown that discrimination accuracy is based on the psychophysical assessment method applied. In the present study, we examined pitch discrimination performance among convenience samples of 19 adult women and ten female children across six different adaptive psychophysical measurement conditions. We found pitch discrimination performance in both groups to be impacted by the measurement paradigm such that, while adults exhibited significantly better discrimination thresholds than did children, the pattern of performance across the six conditions was similar for both the adults and the children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frequency discrimination; pitch processing; psychoacoustics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34474624      PMCID: PMC8665126          DOI: 10.1177/00315125211044063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  34 in total

1.  Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults.

Authors:  M Ahissar; A Protopapas; M Reid; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.

Authors:  M R Leek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Frequency discrimination deficits in people with specific language impairment: reliability, validity, and linguistic correlates.

Authors:  G M McArthur; D V M Bishop
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The relationship between vocal pitch-matching skills and pitch discrimination skills in untrained accurate and inaccurate singers.

Authors:  Christopher Watts; Robert Moore; Kacia McCaghren
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Gal Ben-Yehudah; Karen Banai; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music.

Authors:  Stefanie Hutka; Gavin M Bidelman; Sylvain Moreno
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Effects of Spatial Location of Auditory Tones on Pitch Discrimination.

Authors:  Ashley G Flagge; Julie M Estis; Robert E Moore
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2020-01-05

8.  The Contribution of Frequency Discrimination Ability to Auditory Temporal Patterning Tests in Children.

Authors:  Ashley G Flagge; Tara Davis; Victoria S Henbest
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.

Authors:  Lesli A Guthrie; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Frequency discrimination learning in children.

Authors:  Lorna F Halliday; Jenny L Taylor; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; David R Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.