Literature DB >> 681623

Amplitude-modulated noise: the detection of modulation versus the detection of modulation rate.

R D Patterson, D Johnson-Davies, R Milroy.   

Abstract

Modulation threshold, that is, the modulation depth required to discriminate a sample of amplitude-modulated (AM) noise from a sample of unmodulated noise, was measured as a function of modulation rate (16--320 Hz), modulator waveform (sine or square), and the bandwidth of the AM noise (0.5--8.0 kHz). Modulation threshold increases monotonically with modulation rate, sine-wave thresholds are greater than square-wave thresholds, and threshold rises as the bandwith of the AM stimulus decreases. These effects all support the use of some form of energy detection model to explain modulation threshold. The modulation thresholds were compared with pitch thresholds gathered under precisely the same conditions. Pitch threshold or, alternatively, rate threshold was taken to be the modulation depth required to decide which of two samples had the higher modulation; the rate difference was 20%--just over three semitones. In the region above about 70 Hz, rate threshold is essentially a constant multiple of modulation threshold, indicating that the primary constraint on rate threshold is the audibility of the modulation. Below 70 Hz, rate and modulation threshold diverge; it is argued that the limit on rate threshold in this region is probably the length of the correlation required to extract the periodicity.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 681623     DOI: 10.1121/1.381931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Monaural envelope correlation perception for bands narrower or wider than a critical band.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Syllabic (∼2-5 Hz) and fluctuation (∼1-10 Hz) ranges in speech and auditory processing.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Acquisition versus consolidation of auditory perceptual learning using mixed-training regimens.

Authors:  David W Maidment; HiJee Kang; Emma C Gill; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.