Literature DB >> 26561539

Balancing Score Adjusted Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation.

Samuel David Lendle1, Bruce Fireman2, Mark J van der Laan3.   

Abstract

Adjusting for a balancing score is sufficient for bias reduction when estimating causal effects including the average treatment effect and effect among the treated. Estimators that adjust for the propensity score in a nonparametric way, such as matching on an estimate of the propensity score, can be consistent when the estimated propensity score is not consistent for the true propensity score but converges to some other balancing score. We call this property the balancing score property, and discuss a class of estimators that have this property. We introduce a targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) for a treatment-specific mean with the balancing score property that is additionally locally efficient and doubly robust. We investigate the new estimator's performance relative to other estimators, including another TMLE, a propensity score matching estimator, an inverse probability of treatment weighted estimator, and a regression-based estimator in simulation studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMLE; balancing score; causal inference; matching; propensity score

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561539      PMCID: PMC4637178          DOI: 10.1515/jci-2012-0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Causal Inference        ISSN: 2193-3685


  11 in total

1.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

6.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part II.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  One-Step Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation Based on Universal Least Favorable One-Dimensional Submodels.

Authors:  Mark van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.