Literature DB >> 22462121

Direct effect models.

Mark J van der Laan1, Maya L Petersen.   

Abstract

The causal effect of a treatment on an outcome is generally mediated by several intermediate variables. Estimation of the component of the causal effect of a treatment that is not mediated by an intermediate variable (the direct effect of the treatment) is often relevant to mechanistic understanding and to the design of clinical and public health interventions. Robins, Greenland and Pearl develop counterfactual definitions for two types of direct effects, natural and controlled, and discuss assumptions, beyond those of sequential randomization, required for the identifiability of natural direct effects. Building on their earlier work and that of others, this article provides an alternative counterfactual definition of a natural direct effect, the identifiability of which is based only on the assumption of sequential randomization. In addition, a novel approach to direct effect estimation is presented, based on assuming a model directly on the natural direct effect, possibly conditional on a subset of the baseline covariates. Inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators, double robust inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators, likelihood-based estimators, and targeted maximum likelihood-based estimators are proposed for the unknown parameters of this novel causal model.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 22462121     DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  35 in total

1.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  The role of measurement error and misclassification in mediation analysis: mediation and measurement error.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Linda Valeri; Elizabeth L Ogburn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Mediation and spillover effects in group-randomized trials: a case study of the 4Rs educational intervention.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Guanglei Hong; Stephanie M Jones; Joshua L Brown
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Using marginal structural models to estimate the direct effect of adverse childhood social conditions on onset of heart disease, diabetes, and stroke.

Authors:  Arijit Nandi; M Maria Glymour; Ichiro Kawachi; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Mediation of Neighborhood Effects on Adolescent Substance Use by the School and Peer Environments.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Oleg Sofrygin; Nicole M Schmidt; Rebecca Crowder; M Maria Glymour; Jennifer Ahern; Theresa L Osypuk
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A complete graphical criterion for the adjustment formula in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Ilya Shpitser; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Direct and indirect effects for neighborhood-based clustered and longitudinal data.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2010-05-01

9.  Practical guidance for conducting mediation analysis with multiple mediators using inverse odds ratio weighting.

Authors:  Quynh C Nguyen; Theresa L Osypuk; Nicole M Schmidt; M Maria Glymour; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Mediation analysis for a survival outcome with time-varying exposures, mediators, and confounders.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsuan Lin; Jessica G Young; Roger Logan; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.