Literature DB >> 23607645

Identification and efficient estimation of the natural direct effect among the untreated.

Samuel D Lendle1, Meenakshi S Subbaraman, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

The natural direct effect (NDE), or the effect of an exposure on an outcome if an intermediate variable was set to the level it would have been in the absence of the exposure, is often of interest to investigators. In general, the statistical parameter associated with the NDE is difficult to estimate in the non-parametric model, particularly when the intermediate variable is continuous or high dimensional. In this article, we introduce a new causal parameter called the natural direct effect among the untreated, discuss identifiability assumptions, propose a sensitivity analysis for some of the assumptions, and show that this new parameter is equivalent to the NDE in a randomized controlled trial. We also present a targeted minimum loss estimator (TMLE), a locally efficient, double robust substitution estimator for the statistical parameter associated with this causal parameter. The TMLE can be applied to problems with continuous and high dimensional intermediate variables, and can be used to estimate the NDE in a randomized controlled trial with such data. Additionally, we define and discuss the estimation of three related causal parameters: the natural direct effect among the treated, the indirect effect among the untreated and the indirect effect among the treated.
© 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23607645      PMCID: PMC3692606          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer).

Authors:  John G Bullock; Donald P Green; Shang E Ha
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-04

3.  A general approach to causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Kosuke Imai; Luke Keele; Dustin Tingley
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-12

4.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

6.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond F Anton; Stephanie S O'Malley; Domenic A Ciraulo; Ron A Cisler; David Couper; Dennis M Donovan; David R Gastfriend; James D Hosking; Bankole A Johnson; Joseph S LoCastro; Richard Longabaugh; Barbara J Mason; Margaret E Mattson; William R Miller; Helen M Pettinati; Carrie L Randall; Robert Swift; Roger D Weiss; Lauren D Williams; Allen Zweben
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Generalized causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Albert; Suchitra Nelson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.

Authors:  Peng Ding; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  An educational intervention to improve knowledge about prevention against occupational asthma and allergies using targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Daloha Rodríguez-Molina; Swaantje Barth; Ronald Herrera; Constanze Rossmann; Katja Radon; Veronika Karnowski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Discussion of Identification, Estimation and Approximation of Risk under Interventions that Depend on the Natural Value of Treatment Using Observational Data, by Jessica Young, Miguel Hernán, and James Robins.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Alexander R Luedtke; Iván Díaz
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2014-11-07

4.  Cravings as a mediator and moderator of drinking outcomes in the COMBINE study.

Authors:  Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman; Samuel Lendle; Mark van der Laan; Lee Ann Kaskutas; Jennifer Ahern
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Small-Magnitude Effect Sizes in Epigenetic End Points are Important in Children's Environmental Health Studies: The Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research Center's Epigenetics Working Group.

Authors:  Carrie V Breton; Carmen J Marsit; Elaine Faustman; Kari Nadeau; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Dana C Dolinoy; Julie Herbstman; Nina Holland; Janine M LaSalle; Rebecca Schmidt; Paul Yousefi; Frederica Perera; Bonnie R Joubert; Joseph Wiemels; Michele Taylor; Ivana V Yang; Rui Chen; Kinjal M Hew; Deborah M Hussey Freeland; Rachel Miller; Susan K Murphy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Challenges Raised by Mediation Analysis in a High-Dimension Setting.

Authors:  Michaël G B Blum; Linda Valeri; Olivier François; Solène Cadiou; Valérie Siroux; Johanna Lepeule; Rémy Slama
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.