Literature DB >> 22496068

Revisiting the ultra-high dose rate effect: implications for charged particle radiotherapy using protons and light ions.

P Wilson1, B Jones, T Yokoi, M Hill, B Vojnovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reinvestigate ultra-high dose rate radiation (UHDRR) radiobiology and consider potential implications for hadrontherapy.
METHODS: A literature search of cellular UHDRR exposures was performed. Standard oxygen diffusion equations were used to estimate the time taken to replace UHDRR-related oxygen depletion. Dose rates from conventional and novel methods of hadrontherapy accelerators were considered, including spot scanning beam delivery, which intensifies dose rate.
RESULTS: The literature findings were that, for X-ray and electron dose rates of around 10(9) Gy s(-1), 5-10 Gy depletes cellular oxygen, significantly changing the radiosensitivity of cells already in low oxygen tension (around 3 mmHg or 0.4 kPa). The time taken to reverse the oxygen depletion of such cells is estimated to be over 20-30 s at distances of over 100 μm from a tumour blood vessel. In this time window, tumours have a higher hypoxic fraction (capable of reducing tumour control), so the next application of radiation within the same fraction should be at a time that exceeds these estimates in the case of scanned beams or with ultra-fast laser-generated particles.
CONCLUSION: This study has potential implications for particle therapy, including laser-generated particles, where dose rate is greatly increased. Conventional accelerators probably do not achieve the critical UHDRR conditions. However, specific UHDRR oxygen depletion experiments using proton and ion beams are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22496068      PMCID: PMC3474025          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/17827549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  26 in total

1.  Mathematical models of repopulation and reoxygenation in radiotherapy.

Authors:  O C Scott
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Accelerator physics. The next big beam?

Authors:  Daniel Clery
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Radiobiology. Effect of high dose rates on survival of mammalian cells.

Authors:  C D Town
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Dependence of cell survival on instantaneous dose rate of a linear accelerator.

Authors:  Brita Singers Sørensen; Anne Vestergaard; Jens Overgaard; Lars Hjorth Præstegaard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer.

Authors:  A Fyles; M Milosevic; D Hedley; M Pintilie; W Levin; L Manchul; R P Hill
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Nordsmark; M Overgaard; J Overgaard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  The constant low oxygen concentration in all the target cells for mouse tail radionecrosis.

Authors:  J H Hendry; J V Moore; B W Hodgson; J P Keene
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Acute toxicity profile and compliance to accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen and nicotinamide for clinical stage T2-4 laryngeal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Geert O Janssens; Chris H Terhaard; Patricia A Doornaert; Hendrik P Bijl; Piet van den Ende; Alim Chin; Lucas A Pop; Johannes H Kaanders
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Oxygen diffusion into mammalian cells following ultrahigh dose rate irradiation and lifetime estimates of oxygen-sensitive species.

Authors:  C C Ling; H B Michaels; E R Epp; E C Peterson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  The potential clinical advantages of charged particle radiotherapy using protons or light ions.

Authors:  B Jones
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.126

View more
  17 in total

1.  Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Mark Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Ultra-High Dose-Rate, Pulsed (FLASH) Radiotherapy with Carbon Ions: Generation of Early, Transient, Highly Oxygenated Conditions in the Tumor Environment.

Authors:  Abdullah Muhammad Zakaria; Nicholas W Colangelo; Jintana Meesungnoen; Edouard I Azzam; Marc-Émile Plourde; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Thermal limits on MV x-ray production by bremsstrahlung targets in the context of novel linear accelerators.

Authors:  Jinghui Wang; Stefania Trovati; Philipp M Borchard; Billy W Loo; Peter G Maxim; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas W Colangelo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Enhancing radiosensitivity of melanoma cells through very high dose rate pulses released by a plasma focus device.

Authors:  Francesca Buontempo; Ester Orsini; Isabella Zironi; Lorenzo Isolan; Alessandra Cappellini; Stefania Rapino; Agostino Tartari; Domiziano Mostacci; Giorgio Cucchi; Alberto Maria Martelli; Marco Sumini; Gastone Castellani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  DNA DSB Repair Dynamics following Irradiation with Laser-Driven Protons at Ultra-High Dose Rates.

Authors:  F Hanton; P Chaudhary; D Doria; D Gwynne; C Maiorino; C Scullion; H Ahmed; T Marshall; K Naughton; L Romagnani; S Kar; G Schettino; P McKenna; S Botchway; D R Symes; P P Rajeev; K M Prise; M Borghesi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Modeling the effect of oxygen on the chemical stage of water radiolysis using GPU-based microscopic Monte Carlo simulations, with an application in FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Youfang Lai; Xun Jia; Yujie Chi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The FLASH effect depends on oxygen concentration.

Authors:  Gabriel Adrian; Elise Konradsson; Michael Lempart; Sven Bäck; Crister Ceberg; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Dose-rate effect of ultrashort electron beam radiation on DNA damage and repair in vitro.

Authors:  Nelly Babayan; Galina Hovhannisyan; Bagrat Grigoryan; Ruzanna Grigoryan; Natalia Sarkisyan; Gohar Tsakanova; Samvel Haroutiunian; Rouben Aroutiounian
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.