Literature DB >> 18462929

The potential clinical advantages of charged particle radiotherapy using protons or light ions.

B Jones1.   

Abstract

The increasing use of charged particle radiotherapy (CPT) in many countries will require British oncologists to establish their personal viewpoints on this subject in order to advise their patients regarding the merits or otherwise of obtaining such treatment abroad. This paper covers the advantages and some disadvantages of CPT in many anatomical locations on the basis of the achievable dose distributions as a consequence of the Bragg peak effect. The advantages in terms of normal tissue effects should follow the reduction of tissue volumes exposed to low/moderate dose: significant reductions in acute tissue effects are expected and experienced. For late reacting tissues, the predicted benefits are in the reduction of chronic low-grade symptoms and so improving the quality of life. For tumour control, dose escalation beyond what is achievable with X-ray therapy is possible only for some tumour types. Also, some tumours not presently treated by X-rays can be treated by CPT instead of radical surgery. Many of the available publications about CPT are at 'proof of principle' stage, as the treatment technique continues to be optimised: this is a similar situation to mega-voltage radiotherapy around 50 years ago. Oncologists in the UK need to familiarise themselves with CPT dose distributions, continually educate themselves by following the results of clinical studies as these emerge with time and hopefully visit CPT centres for direct experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18462929     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  12 in total

Review 1.  Accelerator science in medical physics.

Authors:  K Peach; P Wilson; B Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ENLIGHT and other EU-funded projects in hadron therapy.

Authors:  M Dosanjh; B Jones; R Mayer; R Meyer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The apparent increase in the {beta}-parameter of the linear quadratic model with increased linear energy transfer during fast neutron irradiation.

Authors:  B Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Fast neutron relative biological effects and implications for charged particle therapy.

Authors:  B Jones; T S A Underwood; A Carabe-Fernandez; C Timlin; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Revisiting the ultra-high dose rate effect: implications for charged particle radiotherapy using protons and light ions.

Authors:  P Wilson; B Jones; T Yokoi; M Hill; B Vojnovic
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Modelling the throughput capacity of a single-accelerator multitreatment room proton therapy centre.

Authors:  A H Aitkenhead; D Bugg; C G Rowbottom; E Smith; R I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Initial clinical experience with scanned proton beams at the Italian National Center for Hadrontherapy (CNAO).

Authors:  J Tuan; B Vischioni; P Fossati; A Srivastava; V Vitolo; A Iannalfi; M R Fiore; M Krengli; J E Mizoe; R Orecchia
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  A Simpler Energy Transfer Efficiency Model to Predict Relative Biological Effect for Protons and Heavier Ions.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  The effects of radiation on angiogenesis.

Authors:  Peter Grabham; Preety Sharma
Journal:  Vasc Cell       Date:  2013-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.