BACKGROUND: Coronary endothelial function is abnormal in patients with established coronary artery disease and was recently shown by MRI to relate to the severity of luminal stenosis. Recent advances in MRI now allow the noninvasive assessment of both anatomic and functional (endothelial function) changes that previously required invasive studies. We tested the hypothesis that abnormal coronary endothelial function is related to measures of early atherosclerosis such as increased coronary wall thickness. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen arteries in 14 healthy adults and 17 arteries in 14 patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were studied. To measure endothelial function, coronary MRI was performed before and during isometric handgrip exercise, an endothelial-dependent stressor, and changes in coronary cross-sectional area and flow were measured. Black blood imaging was performed to quantify coronary wall thickness and indices of arterial remodeling. The mean stress-induced change in cross-sectional area was significantly higher in healthy adults (13.5%±12.8%, mean±SD, n=17) than in those with mildly diseased arteries (-2.2%±6.8%, P<0.0001, n=17). Mean coronary wall thickness was lower in healthy subjects (0.9±0.2 mm) than in patients with coronary artery disease (1.4±0.3 mm, P<0.0001). In contrast to healthy subjects, stress-induced changes in cross-sectional area, a measure of coronary endothelial function, correlated inversely with coronary wall thickness in patients with coronary artery disease (r=-0.73, P=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: There is an inverse relationship between coronary endothelial function and local coronary wall thickness in patients with coronary artery disease but not in healthy adults. These findings demonstrate that local endothelial-dependent functional changes are related to the extent of early anatomic atherosclerosis in mildly diseased arteries. This combined MRI approach enables the anatomic and functional investigation of early coronary disease.
BACKGROUND: Coronary endothelial function is abnormal in patients with established coronary artery disease and was recently shown by MRI to relate to the severity of luminal stenosis. Recent advances in MRI now allow the noninvasive assessment of both anatomic and functional (endothelial function) changes that previously required invasive studies. We tested the hypothesis that abnormal coronary endothelial function is related to measures of early atherosclerosis such as increased coronary wall thickness. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen arteries in 14 healthy adults and 17 arteries in 14 patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were studied. To measure endothelial function, coronary MRI was performed before and during isometric handgrip exercise, an endothelial-dependent stressor, and changes in coronary cross-sectional area and flow were measured. Black blood imaging was performed to quantify coronary wall thickness and indices of arterial remodeling. The mean stress-induced change in cross-sectional area was significantly higher in healthy adults (13.5%±12.8%, mean±SD, n=17) than in those with mildly diseased arteries (-2.2%±6.8%, P<0.0001, n=17). Mean coronary wall thickness was lower in healthy subjects (0.9±0.2 mm) than in patients with coronary artery disease (1.4±0.3 mm, P<0.0001). In contrast to healthy subjects, stress-induced changes in cross-sectional area, a measure of coronary endothelial function, correlated inversely with coronary wall thickness in patients with coronary artery disease (r=-0.73, P=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: There is an inverse relationship between coronary endothelial function and local coronary wall thickness in patients with coronary artery disease but not in healthy adults. These findings demonstrate that local endothelial-dependent functional changes are related to the extent of early anatomic atherosclerosis in mildly diseased arteries. This combined MRI approach enables the anatomic and functional investigation of early coronary disease.
Authors: W Yong Kim; Matthias Stuber; Peter Börnert; Kraig V Kissinger; Warren J Manning; René M Botnar Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Egbert U Nitzsche; Thomas Munzel; Manfred Olschewski; Ingo Brink; Michael Jeserich; Michael Mix; Peter T Buser; Matthias Pfisterer; Ulrich Solzbach; Hanjörg Just Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul V Targonski; Piero O Bonetti; Geralyn M Pumper; Stuart T Higano; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Udo Hoffmann; Briain MacNeill; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Tom J Brady; Eugene Pomerantsev; Josef Ludwig; Frank A Flachskampf; Stephan Wicky; Ik-kyung Jang; Werner G Daniel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Micaela Iantorno; Allison G Hays; Michael Schär; Rupa Krishnaswamy; Sahar Soleimanifard; Angela Steinberg; Matthias Stuber; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Lauren A Baldassarre; Subha V Raman; James K Min; Jennifer H Mieres; Martha Gulati; Nanette K Wenger; Thomas H Marwick; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; C Noel Bairey Merz; Dipti Itchhaporia; Keith C Ferdinand; Carl J Pepine; Mary Norine Walsh; Jagat Narula; Leslee J Shaw Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-04
Authors: Michael Schär; Sahar Soleimanifard; Gabriele Bonanno; Jérôme Yerly; Allison G Hays; Robert G Weiss Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Micaela Iantorno; Michael Schär; Sahar Soleimanifard; Todd T Brown; Richard Moore; Patricia Barditch-Crovo; Matthias Stuber; Shenghan Lai; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Allison G Hays Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.350