| Literature DB >> 31799707 |
Ahsan Javed1, Andrew Yoon2, Steven Cen3, Krishna S Nayak1, Parveen Garg2.
Abstract
Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, but its assessment has been limited to invasive coronary angiography. Myocardial perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeled (ASL) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be an effective non-invasive alternative for detection of CED. Thirty-four patients were recruited: 10 healthy volunteers, 13 at high-risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), and 11 with established CAD. ASL-CMR was performed continuously in a single mid-short axis slice during rest, stress, and recovery. Stress was induced with sustained isometric handgrip exercise, an endothelial dependent stressor. Myocardial perfusion (MP) during rest, peak stress, and recovery were calculated and compared. After excluding subjects unable to complete the protocol or who exhibited poor data quality, 6 healthy, 10 high-risk, and 7 CAD patients were included in the analysis. Average MP (ml/g/min) was 1.31 ± 1.23, 1.61 ± 1.12, and 1.40 ± 0.97 at rest, and 1.64 ± 1.49, 2.31 ± 1.61, and 2.84 ± 1.77 during stress, for the CAD, high-risk and healthy group, respectively. The average MP response (MPstress - MPrest , ml/g/min) was 0.32 ± 1.93, 0.69 ± 1.34, and 1.44 ± 1.46 for CAD, high-risk and healthy group, respectively. MP during handgrip stress was significantly lower for both the CAD (p = 0.0005) and high-risk groups (p = 0.05) compared to the healthy volunteers. In only the healthy subjects, MP was significantly higher in stress compared to rest (p = 0.0002). Participants with CAD had significantly lower MP response compared to healthy volunteers, as detected by ASL-CMR. These findings support the feasibility of ASL-CMR for non-invasive assessment of CED.Entities:
Keywords: applications; cardiovascular MR (CMR) methods; human study; ischemic heart disease; methods and engineering; myocardial perfusion; perfusion and permeability methods; perfusion spin labeling methods
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799707 PMCID: PMC6980265 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NMR Biomed ISSN: 0952-3480 Impact factor: 4.044