Literature DB >> 11085960

Noninvasive coronary vessel wall and plaque imaging with magnetic resonance imaging.

R M Botnar1, M Stuber, K V Kissinger, W Y Kim, E Spuentrup, W J Manning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional x-ray angiography frequently underestimates the true burden of atherosclerosis. Although intravascular ultrasound allows for imaging of coronary plaque, this invasive technique is inappropriate for screening or serial examinations. We therefore sought to develop a noninvasive free-breathing MR technique for coronary vessel wall imaging. We hypothesized that such an approach would allow for in vivo imaging of coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ten subjects, including 5 healthy adult volunteers (aged 35+/-17 years, range 19 to 56 years) and 5 patients (aged 60+/-4 years, range 56 to 66 years) with x-ray-confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD), were studied with a T2-weighted, dual-inversion, fast spin-echo MR sequence. Multiple adjacent 5-mm cross-sectional images of the proximal right coronary artery were obtained with an in-plane resolution of 0.5x1.0 mm. A right hemidiaphragmatic navigator was used to facilitate free-breathing MR acquisition. Coronary vessel wall images were readily acquired in all subjects. Both coronary vessel wall thickness (1.5+/-0.2 versus 1.0+/-0.2 mm) and wall area (21.2+/-3.1 versus 13.7+/-4.2 mm(2)) were greater in patients with CAD (both P:<0.02 versus healthy adults).
CONCLUSIONS: In vivo free-breathing coronary vessel wall and plaque imaging with MR has been successfully implemented in humans. Coronary wall thickness and wall area were significantly greater in patients with angiographic CAD. The presented technique may have potential applications in patients with known or suspected atherosclerotic CAD or for serial evaluation after pharmacological intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11085960     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.21.2582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  73 in total

1.  New coronary imaging techniques: what to expect?

Authors:  P J de Feyter; K Nieman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Invasive assessment of the coronary circulation: intravascular ultrasound and Doppler.

Authors:  David E Newby; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Future prospects in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mark Doyle; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Noninvasive atherosclerosis imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Douglas S Jacoby; Emile R Mohler III; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  C R Peebles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy : complications and imaging studies.

Authors:  G Di Bella; F Minutoli; S Coglitore; A Recupero; R Donato; R Caruso; P Grimaldi; S Lentini
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Increased coronary vessel wall thickness in HIV-infected young adults.

Authors:  Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Aylin B Unsal; Sarah Eshera; Jatin R Matta; Nancy Muldoon; Dorothea McAreavey; Julia B Purdy; Rohan Hazra; Colleen Hadigan; Ahmed M Gharib
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Black-blood steady-state free precession (SSFP) coronary wall MRI for cardiac allografts: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Xiaoming Bi; Ying Liu; Kirsi Taimen; Biao Lu; Debiao Li; James Carr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Comparison of X-ray fluoroscopy and interventional magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of coronary artery stenoses in swine.

Authors:  Jordin D Green; Reed A Omary; Brian E Schirf; Richard Tang; Biao Lu; James A Gehl; J Jenny Huang; James C Carr; F Scott Pereles; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.