Literature DB >> 17209728

Top-down attention selection is fine grained.

Vidhya Navalpakkam1, Laurent Itti.   

Abstract

Although much is known about the sources and modulatory effects of top-down attentional signals, the information capacity of these signals is less known. Here, we investigate the granularity of top-down attentional signals. Previous theories in psychophysics have provided conflicting evidence on whether top-down guidance is coarse grained (i.e., one gain control term per feature dimension) or fine grained (i.e., multiple gain control terms per dimension). We resolve the conflict by designing new experiments that disentangle top-down from bottom-up contributions, thereby avoiding confounds existing in previous studies. The results of our eye-tracking experiments show that subjects can selectively saccade to items belonging to the relevant feature interval compared with irrelevant intervals within a dimension. This suggests that top-down signals can specify not only the relevant feature dimension but also the relevant feature interval within a dimension. We conclude that top-down signals are fine grained and can specify multiple gain control terms per dimension.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209728     DOI: 10.1167/6.11.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Optimal deployment of attentional gain during fine discriminations.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Continuous and discrete representations of feature-based attentional priority in human frontoparietal network.

Authors:  Mengyuan Gong; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.065

4.  On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.

Authors:  Farhan Baluch; Farhan Baluchg; Laurent Itti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adaptive gaze control in natural environments.

Authors:  Jelena Jovancevic-Misic; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Color priming in pop-out search depends on the relative color of the target.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Christian Valuch; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-08

9.  Does linear separability really matter? Complex visual search is explained by simple search.

Authors:  T Vighneshvel; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Emotions' impact on viewing behavior under natural conditions.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Teresa-Maria Hloucal; Jürgen Kriz; Sonja Canzler; Ricardo Ramos Gameiro; Vanessa Krapp; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.