Literature DB >> 22476340

[Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

C Krettek1, C Müller, R Meller, M Jagodzinski, F Hildebrand, R Gaulke.   

Abstract

We present a literature review about implant removal after operative extremity and spine fracture treatment. The indication for implant removal procedures has become less frequent in recent years, but is still more common in Europe than for example in North America. The time required to perform a implant removal can easily exceed the planned amount. Implant removal can result in significant complications like soft tissue damage, fractures, infections, and other problems. Not only because of these problems, the decision on whether or not to remove the implant should be made with great care. Therefore good communication with the patient and thorough information about risks and benefits are essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476340     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-012-2159-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  42 in total

1.  Injury of the suprascapular nerve during latarjet procedure: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Arthroscopic removal of painful Bristow hardware.

Authors:  B R Bach
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal.

Authors:  Joel A Moore; John R Shank; Steven J Morgan; Wade R Smith
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Removal of internal fixation--the effect on patients' complaints: a study of 66 cases of removal of internal fixation after malleolar fractures.

Authors:  S Jacobsen; M Honnens de Lichtenberg; C M Jensen; C Tørholm
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. 31 patients followed for 3-7 years.

Authors:  L M Hove; P T Nilsen; O Furnes; H E Oulie; E Solheim; A O Mölster
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-02

6.  Bone screws have advantages in repair of experimental osteochondral fragments.

Authors:  Michihaya Kono; Ryuji Mori; Yuji Uchio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Delayed ruptures of the extensor tendon secondary to the use of volar locking compression plates for distal radial fractures.

Authors:  M Al-Rashid; K Theivendran; M A C Craigen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-12

8.  Percutaneous screw fixation for scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  C Iacobellis; S Baldan; R Aldegheri
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-04-09

9.  Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw.

Authors:  N Hamid; B J Loeffler; W Braddy; J F Kellam; B E Cohen; M J Bosse
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

10.  Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion.

Authors:  R L Needleman; D A Skrade; J B Stiehl
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  The benefits of elective spinal implant removal: a retrospective study of 137 patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Vinicius Gomes de Lima; Burkhardt Seifert; Kai Sprengel; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of magnesium versus titanium screw fixation for biplane chevron medial malleolar osteotomy in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Baver Acar; Ozkan Kose; Melih Unal; Adil Turan; Yusuf Alper Kati; Ferhat Guler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 3.  Fractures of the ankle joint: investigation and treatment options.

Authors:  Hans Goost; Matthias D Wimmer; Alexej Barg; Kouroush Kabir; Victor Valderrabano; Christof Burger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  [Consequences of uncritical indication assessment for hardware removal].

Authors:  F Liska; J Neu
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Indications of implant removal: A study of 83 cases.

Authors:  Muhammad Haseeb; Muhammad Farooq Butt; Tariq Altaf; Khalid Muzaffar; Anil Gupta; Aleena Jallu
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Moritz Crönlein; Markus Wurm; Marc Beirer; Michael Zyskowski; Christopher Völk; Arthur Schwarz; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Henning Windhagen; Kerstin Radtke; Andreas Weizbauer; Julia Diekmann; Yvonne Noll; Ulrike Kreimeyer; Robert Schavan; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Hazibullah Waizy
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Correlation Between Residual Displacement and Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Cannulated Screw Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Gui-Jun Xu; Zhe Han; Xuan Jiang; Cheng-Bao Zhang; Qiang Dong; Jian-Xiong Ma; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.