Literature DB >> 7951948

Removal of internal fixation--the effect on patients' complaints: a study of 66 cases of removal of internal fixation after malleolar fractures.

S Jacobsen1, M Honnens de Lichtenberg, C M Jensen, C Tørholm.   

Abstract

To estimate the effect of removal of internal fixation after treatment of malleolar fractures on postoperatively presented complaints, we retrospectively evaluated 66 patients by their records and by personal questionnaires. Of all the patients, 89.4% had one or more complaints. These were typically soreness over implant and cicatrix, reduced movement of the ankle joint, and strain-related pain. About 75% of these patients reported improvement after removal. The AO mode of fixation, i.e., typically by lateral semitubular plating and transsyndesmotic screw and a medial screw or pins, and the Wiberg-Cedell mode, i.e., typically consisting of lateral single or double cerclage and staple and medial pinning, constituted the principal groupings of the patients. The two groups were comparable. In this series, we found significantly more complaints associated with the AO mode in the postoperative period. We conclude that removal of internal fixation after malleolar fractures is indicated when common types of complaints are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7951948     DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Sonographic assessment of orthopedic hardware impingement on soft tissues of the limbs.

Authors:  R Guillin; S Bianchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-01-23

3.  Clinical Comparison of Minifragment Plates Versus Conventional Semitubular Plates for Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.

Authors:  John Gentile; Benjamin C Taylor; Raymond Chan; Bruce French
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-03-10

4.  Implant Removal Matrix for the upper Extremity Orthopedic Surgeon.

Authors:  Patrick K Cronin; Ian T Watkins; Matthew Riedel; Philip B Kaiser; John Y Kwon
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

5.  The use of T-LCP (locking compression plate) for the treatment of the lateral malleolar fractures.

Authors:  Hak Jun Kim; Jong-Keon Oh; Jin-Ho Hwang; Young Hwan Park
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-02-07

6.  [Osteosynthesis of Weber B ankle fractures using the one-third tubular plate and refixation of the syndesmosis].

Authors:  C Spering; V Lesche; K Dresing
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Arthroscopy combined with hardware removal for chronic pain after ankle fracture.

Authors:  Hyong-Nyun Kim; Yoo-Jung Park; Gab-Lae Kim; Yong-Wook Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Complications of implant removal in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Taro Kasai; Takumi Matsumoto; Toru Iga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  The Cedell method (cerclage wire and staple) leads to less reoperations than the AO method: a retrospective comparative study of 347 lateral ankle fractures.

Authors:  Sara S Berggren; Carl Johan Tiderius
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.