Literature DB >> 24893726

[Consequences of uncritical indication assessment for hardware removal].

F Liska1, J Neu.   

Abstract

A 43-year-old woman sustained a severe ankle dislocation with distal fibular fracture in a domestic accident. This was initially treated with external fixation for 3 weeks. In addition to distal fibular fracture treatment using a fixed-angle locking plate system, a vacuum-assisted wound closure of the medial und lateral malleolus had to be performed due to a persisting difficult soft tissue situation with swelling and necrosis of the medial malleolus. Subsequently, after prolonged wound healing the soft tissue defect over the distal fibula could be covered with a split skin graft and the external fixation was removed. Implant removal was performed 2 years after primary treatment - following radiologically confirmed consolidation of the fracture. Intraoperatively, an iatrogenic oblique fracture of the fibula occurred due to a cold welded screw in the plate, which had to be treated with lag screws. In the further course, there was renewed extensive wound healing with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The patient filed a complaint for the iatrogenic fibular fracture during hardware removal and also criticized the insufficient wound closure which led to an impairment of wound healing. The expert opinion of the arbitration board ascertained a medical malpractice in terms of indications. Due to the already prolonged course after the primary osteosynthesis hardware removal was not recommended. In addition, the surgical technique that led to the iatrogenic fracture was criticized. The arbitration board furthermore concluded that with a pre-existing osteoarthritis of the ankle, hardware removal was not indicated. In a critical wound situation implant removal would only be indicated with simultaneous treatment of the osteoarthritis of the ankle. By means of a critical indication assessment the patient should have been advised to leave the plate in place and the complicated course with iatrogenic fracture and severely delayed wound healing could have been avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24893726     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-014-2583-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Removal of metal in traumatology].

Authors:  J Müller-Färber
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Removal of plates and screws. Tips and tricks for problematic cases].

Authors:  D Höntzsch; F M Stuby
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units.

Authors:  O Böstman; H Pihlajamäki
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-11

5.  Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zong-Huan Li; Ai-Xi Yu; Xiao-Peng Guo; Bai-Wen Qi; Min Zhou; Wei-Yang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Novel Surgical Technique for Removing Buried Cannulated Screws Using a Guidewire and Countersink: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Yongsheng Chen; Krishna Prasad Giri; Christopher Jon Pearce
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-06-26

2.  Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Moritz Crönlein; Markus Wurm; Marc Beirer; Michael Zyskowski; Christopher Völk; Arthur Schwarz; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.