Literature DB >> 19651836

Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw.

N Hamid1, B J Loeffler, W Braddy, J F Kellam, B E Cohen, M J Bosse.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with intact, broken and removed syndesmosis screws after Weber B or C ankle fracture with an associated injury to the syndesmosis. We hypothesised that there would be no difference. Of a possible 142 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria, 52 returned for clinical and radiological assessment at least one year after surgery. Of these, 27 had intact syndesmosis screws, ten had broken screws, and 15 had undergone elective removal of the screw. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score was 83.07 (sd 13.59) in the intact screw group, 92.40 (sd 12.69) in the broken screw group, and 85.80 (sd 11.33) in the removed screw group (p = 0.0466). There was no difference in clinical outcome of patients with intact or removed syndesmotic screws. Paradoxically, patients with a broken syndesmosis screw had the best clinical outcome. Our data do not support the removal of intact or broken syndesmosis screws, and we caution against attributing post-operative ankle pain to breakage of the syndesmosis screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651836     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  28 in total

Review 1.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function.

Authors:  Yi-Ton Hsu; Chi-Chuan Wu; Wei-Cheun Lee; Kuo-Feng Fan; I-Chuan Tseng; Po-Cheng Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis.

Authors:  Brady T Williams; Evan W James; Kyle A Jisa; C Thomas Haytmanek; Robert F LaPrade; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics.

Authors:  Jian Che; Chunbao Li; Zhipeng Gao; Wei Qi; Binping Ji; Yujie Liu; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 7.  Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete.

Authors:  Graham A McCollum; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Effects of inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis injury and screw stabilization on motion of the ankle: a finite element study.

Authors:  Qinghua Liu; Guanghui Zhao; Bin Yu; Jianbin Ma; Zhong Li; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.

Authors:  Guang-Shu Yu; Yan-Bin Lin; Guo-Sheng Xiong; Hong-Bin Xu; You-Ying Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.