Literature DB >> 22467170

Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial.

Ronald J Wapner1, Deborah A Driscoll, Joe Leigh Simpson.   

Abstract

Cytogenetic microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal testing detects chromosome abnormalities and new genetic syndromes that would be missed by conventional cytogenetics and has the potential to significantly enhance prenatal genetic evaluation. A large Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)-sponsored multicentered trial to assess the role of CMA as a primary prenatal diagnostic tool has been completed, and results will soon be available. Integration of this technology into clinical care will require thoughtful changes in patient counseling. Here, we examine four cases, all ascertained in the NICHD prenatal microarray study, to illustrate the challenges and subtleties of genetic counseling required with prenatal CMA testing. Although the specifics of each case are distinct, the underlying genetic principles of uncertainty, variable expressivity, and lack of precise genotype-phenotype correlation are well known and already part of prenatal counseling. Counselor and practitioner education will need to include both the science of interpreting array findings as well as development of improved approaches to uncertainty. A team approach to interpretation will need to be developed, as will standardized guidelines by professional organizations and laboratories. Of equal import is additional research into patient attitudes and desires, and a better understanding of the full phenotypic spectrum of copy number variants discovered in utero.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467170      PMCID: PMC4251739          DOI: 10.1002/pd.3863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  26 in total

1.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.

Authors:  Idit Maya; Bella Davidov; Liron Gershovitz; Yael Zalzstein; Ellen Taub; Justine Coppinger; Lisa G Shaffer; Mordechai Shohat
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings.

Authors:  M Tyreman; K M Abbott; L R Willatt; R Nash; C Lees; J Whittaker; I Simonic
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  B S Emanuel; D McDonald-McGinn; S C Saitta; E H Zackai
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants.

Authors:  Hutton M Kearney; Erik C Thorland; Kerry K Brown; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Sarah T South
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Copy number variations associated with autism spectrum disorders contribute to a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Jill A Rosenfeld; Blake C Ballif; Beth S Torchia; Trilochan Sahoo; J Britt Ravnan; Roger Schultz; Allen Lamb; Bassem A Bejjani; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A Craig Chinault; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Benjamin B Roa; Arthur L Beaudet; Christine M Eng
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  A deletion and a duplication in distal 22q11.2 deletion syndrome region. Clinical implications and review.

Authors:  Luis Fernández; Julián Nevado; Fernando Santos; Damià Heine-Suñer; Victor Martinez-Glez; Sixto García-Miñaur; Rebeca Palomo; Alicia Delicado; Isidora López Pajares; María Palomares; Luis García-Guereta; Eva Valverde; Federico Hawkins; Pablo Lapunzina
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Deletion at ITPR1 underlies ataxia in mice and spinocerebellar ataxia 15 in humans.

Authors:  Joyce van de Leemput; Jayanth Chandran; Melanie A Knight; Lynne A Holtzclaw; Sonja Scholz; Mark R Cookson; Henry Houlden; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Hon-Chung Fung; Xian Lin; Dena Hernandez; Javier Simon-Sanchez; Nick W Wood; Paola Giunti; Ian Rafferty; John Hardy; Elsdon Storey; R J McKinlay Gardner; Susan M Forrest; Elizabeth M C Fisher; James T Russell; Huaibin Cai; Andrew B Singleton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  17 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren C Sayres; Jaime S King; Mary E Norton; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting.

Authors:  Swetha Narayanan; Bruce Blumberg; Marla L Clayman; Vivian Pan; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin Em Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Femke At de Vries; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Merel C de Wit; Attie Tji Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Amelia L M Sutton; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Mindy P Dabell; Allan J Fisher; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Jill A Rosenfeld
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lauren Westerfield; Sandra Darilek; Ignatia B van den Veyver
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.