Literature DB >> 26328504

Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Malgorzata I Srebniak1, Karin Em Diderich1, Marieke Joosten1, Lutgarde Cp Govaerts1, Jeroen Knijnenburg1, Femke At de Vries1, Marjan Boter1, Debora Lont1, Maarten Fcm Knapen2,3, Merel C de Wit2, Attie Tji Go2, Robert-Jan H Galjaard1, Diane Van Opstal1.   

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic value of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array testing in 1033 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies we investigated the prevalence and genetic nature of pathogenic findings. We reclassified all pathogenic findings into three categories: causative findings; unexpected diagnoses (UD); and susceptibility loci (SL) for neurodevelopmental disorders. After exclusion of trisomy 13, 18, 21, sex-chromosomal aneuploidy and triploidies, in 76/1033 (7.4%) fetuses a pathogenic chromosome abnormality was detected by genomic SNP array: in 19/1033 cases (1.8%) a microscopically detectable abnormality was found and in 57/1033 (5.5%) fetuses a pathogenic submicroscopic chromosome abnormality was detected. 58% (n=44) of all these pathogenic chromosome abnormalities involved a causative finding, 35% (n=27) a SL for neurodevelopmental disorder, and 6% (n=5) a UD of an early-onset untreatable disease. In 0.3% of parental samples an incidental pathogenic finding was encountered. Our results confirm that a genomic array should be the preferred first-tier technique in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. All UDs involved early-onset diseases, which is beneficial for the patients to know. It also seems that UDs occur at a comparable frequency among microscopic and submicroscopic pathogenic findings. SL were more often detected than in pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328504      PMCID: PMC4930096          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  36 in total

1.  Whole-genome array as a first-line cytogenetic test in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  M I Srebniak; D Van Opstal; M Joosten; K E M Diderich; F A T de Vries; S Riedijk; M F C M Knapen; A T J I Go; L C P Govaerts; R-J H Galjaard
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Benefits and burdens of using a SNP array in pregnancies at increased risk for the common aneuploidies.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Femke de Vries; Lutgarde Govaerts; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Stefanie van Veen; Marieke Joosten; Karin Diderich; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Unexpected findings in cancer predisposition genes detected by array comparative genomic hybridisation: what are the issues?

Authors:  Gabriella Pichert; Shehla Nilofer Mohammed; Joo Wook Ahn; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie; Louise Izatt
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Towards an evidence-based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation.

Authors:  E R Riggs; D M Church; K Hanson; V L Horner; E B Kaminsky; R M Kuhn; K E Wain; E S Williams; S Aradhya; H M Kearney; D H Ledbetter; S T South; E C Thorland; C L Martin
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  F Scott; K Murphy; L Carey; W Greville; N Mansfield; P Barahona; R Robertson; A McLennan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M C de Wit; M I Srebniak; L C P Govaerts; D Van Opstal; R J H Galjaard; A T J I Go
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan; Jill A Rosenfeld; Bradley P Coe; Sumit Parikh; Neil Friedman; Amy Goldstein; Robyn A Filipink; Juliann S McConnell; Brad Angle; Wendy S Meschino; Marjan M Nezarati; Alexander Asamoah; Kelly E Jackson; Gordon C Gowans; Judith A Martin; Erin P Carmany; David W Stockton; Rhonda E Schnur; Lynette S Penney; Donna M Martin; Salmo Raskin; Kathleen Leppig; Heidi Thiese; Rosemarie Smith; Erika Aberg; Dmitriy M Niyazov; Luis F Escobar; Dima El-Khechen; Kisha D Johnson; Robert R Lebel; Kiana Siefkas; Susie Ball; Natasha Shur; Marianne McGuire; Campbell K Brasington; J Edward Spence; Laura S Martin; Carol Clericuzio; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations.

Authors:  Jill A Rosenfeld; Bradley P Coe; Evan E Eichler; Howard Cuckle; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Mindy P Dabell; Allan J Fisher; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Jill A Rosenfeld
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Single nucleotide polymorphism array in genetic evaluation of fetal ultrasound abnormalities: a retrospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Hailong Huang; Meiying Cai; Huili Xue; Liangpu Xu; Na Lin
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 3.  Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Vivian Tam; Nikunj Patel; Michelle Turcotte; Yohan Bossé; Guillaume Paré; David Meyre
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis: a rapid scoping review.

Authors:  Misty Pratt; Chantelle Garritty; Micere Thuku; Leila Esmaeilisaraji; Candyce Hamel; Taila Hartley; Kathryn Millar; Becky Skidmore; Shelley Dougan; Christine M Armour
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.

Authors:  Luca Lovrecic; Ziga Iztok Remec; Marija Volk; Gorazd Rudolf; Karin Writzl; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  The frequency of CNVs in a cohort population of consecutive fetuses with congenital anomalies after the termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  Gorazd Rudolf; Luca Lovrečić; Nataša Tul; Nataša Teran; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.

Authors:  Hongyan Chai; Autumn DiAdamo; Brittany Grommisch; Fang Xu; Qinghua Zhou; Jiadi Wen; Maurice Mahoney; Allen Bale; James McGrath; Michele Spencer-Manzon; Peining Li; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 8.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm) in the first trimester - not all chromosome aberrations can be detected by NIPT.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Merel C de Wit; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Marnix J Bos; Gerda A G Looye-Bruinsma; Mieke Koningen; Attie T J I Go; Robert Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents' Experiences.

Authors:  S L van der Steen; S R Riedijk; J Verhagen-Visser; L C P Govaerts; M I Srebniak; D Van Opstal; M Joosten; M F C M Knapen; A Tibben; K E M Diderich; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.