Literature DB >> 22863603

Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context.

Megan Allyse1, Lauren C Sayres, Jaime S King, Mary E Norton, Mildred K Cho.   

Abstract

The recent release of new, non-invasive prenatal tests for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) has been hailed as a revolution in prenatal testing and has triggered significant commercial interest in the field. Ongoing research portends the arrival of a wide range of cffDNA tests. However, it is not yet clear how these tests will be integrated into well-established prenatal testing strategies in the USA, as the timing of such testing and the degree to which new non-invasive tests will supplement or replace existing screening and diagnostic tools remain uncertain. We argue that there is an urgent need for policy-makers, regulators and professional societies to provide guidance on the most efficient and ethical manner for such tests to be introduced into clinical practice in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863603      PMCID: PMC3472618          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  61 in total

1.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.

Authors:  Michael D Rawlins; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

2.  International evolution of legislation and guidelines in medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Guido Pennings
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Commentary: No risk, no objections? Ethical pitfalls of cell-free fetal DNA and RNA testing.

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz; Wolfram Henn; Christian Netzer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-06

Review 4.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals.

Authors:  Ananda van den Heuvel; Lyn Chitty; Elizabeth Dormandy; Ainsley Newson; Zuzana Deans; Sophie Attwood; Shelley Haynes; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-06-26

7.  The cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Sarah E Little; Vanitha Janakiraman; Anjali Kaimal; Thomas Musci; Jeffrey Ecker; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Lawrence D Platt; James D Goldberg; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  'Because of the risks': how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening.

Authors:  S Markens; C H Browner; N Press
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Cosmin Deciu; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow; Louis M Neveux; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk van den Boom; Allan T Bombard; Wayne W Grody; Stanley F Nelson; Jacob A Canick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies.

Authors:  Josephine Johnston; John D Lantos; Aaron Goldenberg; Flavia Chen; Erik Parens; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Prenatal screening for fragile x: carriers, controversies, and counseling.

Authors:  Julie F Gutiérrez; Komal Bajaj; Susan D Klugman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

3.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

4.  Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age.

Authors:  M Allyse; L C Sayres; T A Goodspeed; M K Cho
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients' Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result.

Authors:  Forum T Shah; Kathryn Steinhaus French; Kathryn E Osann; Maureen Bocian; Marilyn C Jones; Lauren Korty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Developmental potential of clinically discarded human embryos and associated chromosomal analysis.

Authors:  Guidong Yao; Jiawei Xu; Zhimin Xin; Wenbin Niu; Senlin Shi; Haixia Jin; Wenyan Song; Enyin Wang; Qingling Yang; Lei Chen; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.