Literature DB >> 22465085

Factors affecting stone-free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stone.

Ahmed R el-Nahas1, Ibrahim Eraky, Ahmed A Shokeir, Ahmed M Shoma, Ahmed M el-Assmy, Nasr A el-Tabey, Shady Soliman, Ahmed M Elshal, Hamdy A el-Kappany, Mahmoud R el-Kenawy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors affecting the stone-free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for treatment of staghorn stones.
METHODS: The computerized database of patients who underwent PNL for treatment of staghorn stones between January 2003 and January 2011 was reviewed. All perioperative complications were recorded and classified according to modified Clavien classification system. The stone-free rate was evaluated with low-dose noncontrast computed tomography (CT). Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to determine factors affecting stone-free and complication rates.
RESULTS: The study included 241 patients (125 male and 116 female) with a mean age of 48.7 ±14.3 years. All patients underwent 251 PNL (10 patients had bilateral stones). The stone-free rate of PNL monotherapy was 56% (142 procedures). At 3 months, the stone-free rate increased to 73% (183 kidneys) after shock wave lithotripsy. Independent risk factors for residual stones were complete staghorn stone and presence of secondary calyceal stones (relative risks were 2.2 and 3.1, respectively). The complication rate was 27% (68 PNL). Independent risk factors for development of complications were performance of the procedure by urologists other than experienced endourologist and positive preoperative urine culture (relative risks were 2.2 and 2.1, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Factors affecting the incidence of residual stones after PNL are complete staghorn stones and the presence of secondary calyceal stones. Complications are significantly high if PNL is not performed by an experienced endourologist or if preoperative urine culture is positive.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465085     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

Review 1.  Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: Are we really healing our patients?

Authors:  Leonardo de Albuquerque Dos Santos Abreu; Douglas Gregório Camilo-Silva; Gustavo Fiedler; Gustavo Barboza Corguinha; Matheus Miranda Paiva; João Antonio Pereira-Correia; Valter José Fernandes Muller
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

2.  A comparative study to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for residual calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Jiaming Wen; Zhongyi Li; Zhewei Zhang; Xiuqing Gong; Jimin Chen; Chuanjun Du
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Evaluation of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system as a predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Hasan Anıl Atalay; Lutfi Canat; Recep Bayraktarlı; Ilter Alkan; Osman Can; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Letter to the Editor regarding the article "A contemporary lower pole approach for complete staghorn calculi: outcomes and efficacy".

Authors:  Huiming Jiang; Shiwu Yao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Do 3D-calculated volume distribution of a stone in pelvicalyceal system affect complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Sait Özbir; Hasan Anıl Atalay; Halil Lütfi Canat; Mehmet Gökhan Çulha
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Costs variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the U.S. from 2003-2015: A contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anne-Sophie Valiquette; Benjamin I Chung; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Rus Korets; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Mansour Masoumi; Bahman Goshtasbi; Amirhossein Aminsharifi; Reza Mohamadian
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Preoperative risk factors for complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A Nabeeh; Mahmoud Laymon; Khaled Z Sheir; Hamdy A El-Kappany; Yasser Osman
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.