Literature DB >> 32740673

Preoperative risk factors for complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Mohamed A Nabeeh2, Mahmoud Laymon2, Khaled Z Sheir2, Hamdy A El-Kappany2, Yasser Osman2.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate preoperative risk factors for development of complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). All consecutive patients aged ≥ 16 years who underwent PCNL during 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) was performed for all patients to evaluate stone complexity. The technique of PCNL was the same for all patients. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded and classified based on modified Clavien system. The differences in preoperative data (patients, renal and stone characteristics including Guy's and STONE scores) between complicated and uncomplicated cases were compared using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses for detection of independent risk factors. The study included 1178 patients (61% were males). Mean age was 50 ± 12 years, and mean BMI was 30.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Complicated group included 166 patients (14.1%). Independent risk factors on multivariate analysis were infected preoperative urine culture (RR: 2.098, P 0.001, 95%CI: 1.380-3.189), largest stones diameter 30 mm or more (RR: 2.481, P > 0.001, 95%CI: 1.697-3.627) and number of calyces affected by the stones (RR: 2.431, P 0.002, 95%CI: 1.400-4.222 for affection of two calyces and RR: 2.778, P 0.005, 95%CI: 1.357-5.684 for affection of three calyces). While two scoring systems (Guy's and STONE) were not predictive of complications after PCNL, preoperative risk factors were infected preoperative urine culture, distribution of the stones or stone branches in two or three calyceal groups and stone size 30 mm or more.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal calculi; Risk; Scores; Stones

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32740673     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01203-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  30 in total

1.  The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications.

Authors:  Gaston Labate; Pranjal Modi; Anthony Timoney; Luigi Cormio; Xiaochun Zhang; Michael Louie; Magnus Grabe; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  The Guy's stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures.

Authors:  Kay Thomas; Naomi C Smith; Nicholas Hegarty; Jonathan M Glass
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy at a Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors:  Daniel Olvera-Posada; Thomas Tailly; Husain Alenezi; Philippe D Violette; Linda Nott; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Authors:  Zhamshid Okhunov; Justin I Friedlander; Arvin K George; Brian D Duty; Daniel M Moreira; Arun K Srinivasan; Joel Hillelsohn; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Comparison of S.T.O.N.E and CROES nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 262 cases.

Authors:  Serkan Yarimoglu; Salih Polat; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarık Yonguc; Ozgu Aydogdu; Erhan Aydın; Tansu Degirmenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes Based on S.T.O.N.E., GUY, CROES, and S-ReSC Scoring Systems: The First Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Al Adl; Ahmed Mohey; Ashraf Abdel Aal; Hosam Abdel Fattah Abu-Elnasr; Tarek El Karamany; Yasser A Noureldin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Arthur Smith; Timothy D Averch; Khaled Shahrour; Dedan Opondo; Francisco P J Daels; Gaston Labate; Burak Turna; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for Predicting Stone-Free Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jin-Woo Jung; Woo Heon Cha; Byung Ki Lee; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart; Dominik Abt; Hans-Peter Schmid; Cedric Michael Panje; Paul Martin Putora
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical study on the minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of upper urinary calculi.

Authors:  Xiao-Jian Xu; Jun Zhang; Miao Li; Jian-Quan Hou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Nomogram for predicting risk factor of urosepsis in patients with diabetes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jie Gu; Jun Liu; Yang Hong; Yi Feng; Xiaobo Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.