Literature DB >> 28646306

Evaluation of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system as a predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective single-center study.

Hasan Anıl Atalay1, Lutfi Canat2, Recep Bayraktarlı3, Ilter Alkan2, Osman Can2, Fatih Altunrende2.   

Abstract

We analyzed our stone-free rates of PNL with regard to stone burden and its ratio to the renal collecting system volume. Data of 164 patients who underwent PNL were analyzed retrospectively. Volume segmentation of renal collecting system and stones were done using 3D segmentation software with the images obtained from CT data. Analyzed stone volume (ASV) and renal collecting system volume (RCSV) were measured and the ASV-to-RCSV ratio was calculated after the creation of a 3D surface volume rendering of renal stones and the collecting system. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to determine factors affecting stone-free rates; also we assessed the predictive accuracy of the ASV-to-RCSV ratio using the receiving operating curve (ROC) and AUC. The stone-free rate of PNL monotherapy was 53% (164 procedures).The ASV-to-RCSV ratio and calyx number with stones were the most influential predictors of stone-free status (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.24-7.24, <0.001, OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.38-4.97, p < 0.001, respectively). Other factors associated with the stone-free rate were maximum stone size (p < 0.029), stone surface area (p < 0.010), and stone burden volume (p < 0.001). Predictive accuracy of the ASV-to-RCSV ratio was AUC 0.76. Stone burden volume distribution in the renal collecting system, which is calculated using the 3D volume segmentation method, is a significant determinant of the stone-free rate before PCNL surgery. It could be used as a single guide variable by the clinician before renal stone surgery to predict extra requirements for stone clearance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stone-free rate; Three dimensional; Volume segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646306     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0995-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of immediate postoperative outcome of single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Khaled Shahrour; Jeffrey Tomaszewski; Tara Ortiz; Emily Scott; Kevan M Sternberg; Stephen V Jackman; Timothy D Averch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Computed tomography for percutaneous renal access.

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; Uday Patel; Ken Anson
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Authors:  Zhamshid Okhunov; Justin I Friedlander; Arvin K George; Brian D Duty; Daniel M Moreira; Arun K Srinivasan; Joel Hillelsohn; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Logistic regression model for predicting stone-free rate after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Zhaowei Zhu; Shaogang Wang; Qilin Xi; Jian Bai; Xiao Yu; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Antonello De Lisa; Burak Turna; Jorge Rioja; Helena Walfridsson; Alessandro D'Addessi; Carson Wong; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; Dean Assimos; Mahesh Desai; Jorge Gutierrez; James Lingeman; Roberto Scarpa; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Sculpturing in urology, or how to make percutaneous nephrolithotomy easier.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Sergei Brovkin; Vladislav Grigoryev; Nair Tagirov; Valeriy Korol; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center's experience over 15 years.

Authors:  Frédéric Soucy; Raymond Ko; Mordechai Duvdevani; Linda Nott; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs open surgery for renal calculi. A comparative study.

Authors:  G M Preminger; R V Clayman; S W Hardeman; J Franklin; T Curry; P C Peters
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do 3D-calculated volume distribution of a stone in pelvicalyceal system affect complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Sait Özbir; Hasan Anıl Atalay; Halil Lütfi Canat; Mehmet Gökhan Çulha
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  3D Imaging Segmentation and 3D Rendering Process for a Precise Puncture Strategy During PCNL - a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Otaš Durutović; Aleksandar Filipović; Katarina Milićević; Bhaskar Somani; Esteban Emiliani; Andreas Skolarikos; Milica M Janković
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.