Literature DB >> 22459560

Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.

Emily M Elliott1, Alicia M Briganti.   

Abstract

Irrelevant words can be disruptive to performance, and the frequency of usage of the irrelevant words has affected the magnitude of such disruption (Buchner & Erdfelder, 2005). The finding of word frequency differences in the magnitude of the irrelevant speech effect (ISE) implicated a role for attentional processes. Using a different conceptualization of attention, researchers have found that individual differences in working memory capacity did not predict the magnitude of the ISE, which questioned the role of attentional control (Beaman, 2004; Sörqvist, 2010). The current study investigated aspects of the construct of attention and the ISE, using both individual and developmental difference approaches. Results showed no significant difference between serial recall performances in the presence of high or low word frequency distractors. Furthermore, effects of working memory capacity differences were not found, but children displayed a larger ISE than college students. The weight of the evidence appears against an attentional resource view of the ISE.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459560     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  14 in total

1.  Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Naveen K Nagaraj; Beula M Magimairaj; Sarah Schwartz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

Review 5.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

6.  Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience.

Authors:  Bar Lambez; Galit Agmon; Paz Har-Shai Yahav; Yuri Rassovsky; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

8.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children.

Authors:  Maria Klatte; Kirstin Bergström; Thomas Lachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-30

10.  Unintentional activation of translation equivalents in bilinguals leads to attention capture in a cross-modal visual task.

Authors:  Niharika Singh; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.