Literature DB >> 22459319

Usability of a daily noise exposure monitoring device for industrial workers.

Steven C Williams1, Peter M Rabinowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Usability is an important but often overlooked aspect of personal protective equipment technology. As part of a worksite intervention trial of a new technology for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss that allows workers to monitor their noise exposure inside of hearing protection on a daily basis, we studied the usability of the daily noise exposure monitoring device.
METHODS: We conducted surveys and focus groups for workers enrolled in an intervention trial of daily use of a noise dosimeter with a microphone fitted inside of an individual's hearing protector (QuietDose). Volunteers completed a baseline and annual survey that included questions about perceived usability of the QuietDose device. Responses to usability questions on the annual survey were abstracted and compared to whether the individual was still using the device. Finally, 16 in-depth focus groups were conducted with subjects to qualitatively explore common themes regarding the usability of the technology.
RESULTS: Reported problems downloading data or starting and stopping the monitoring device and/or ear discomfort were associated with whether individuals chose to continue monitoring and downloading their noise exposure data. Perceived benefits of the technology included the perception that it could help preserve hearing.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel technology that allows workers to record noise exposures inside of hearing protectors on a daily basis has been developed. Current users of the device report positive perception about how the device is helping them prevent noise-induced hearing loss. However, in its current version, users reported a number of usability barriers that are associated with stopping use of the device. These barriers to use should be addressed as the technology progresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459319      PMCID: PMC3656687          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mes028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  7 in total

Review 1.  Application of behavior-change theories and methods to injury prevention.

Authors:  Andrea Carlson Gielen; David Sleet
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort?

Authors:  P M Rabinowitz; D Galusha; C Dixon-Ernst; M D Slade; M R Cullen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers--NHANES, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Sangwoo Tak; Rickie R Davis; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.

Authors:  E H Berger; J R Franks; A Behar; J G Casali; C Dixon-Ernst; R W Kieper; C J Merry; B T Mozo; C W Nixon; D Ohlin; J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Sharon R Kirsche; Mark R Cullen; Martin D Slade; Christine Dixon-Ernst
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Injuries and use of protective equipment among college in-line skaters.

Authors:  R M Williams-Avery; D P MacKinnon
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1996-11

7.  Impact of OSHA final rule--recording hearing loss: an analysis of an industrial audiometric dataset.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Martin Slade; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Kanta Sircar; Mark Cullen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.162

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workers.

Authors:  Michael F McTague; Deron Galusha; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Sharon R Kirsche; Martin D Slade; Mark R Cullen; Peter M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 2.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.

Authors:  Alessandra G Samelli; Raquel F Gomes; Tiago V Chammas; Bárbara G Silva; Renata R Moreira; Ana C Fiorini
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Recent advances in hearing conservation programmes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nomfundo F Moroe; Katijah Khoza-Shangase
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.